Mimarlıkta Sayısal Tasarım Pedagojisi Bağlamında Enformel Öğrenme

Bayram, Asena Kumsal Şen; Güzelci, Orkan Zeynel; Alaçam, Sema

doi:10.53710/jcode.1227228

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

(6 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The last title, Form in the Millenium (Figure 2), encompasses the first quarter of the twenty-first century, the effects of the paradigm shift resulting from the development of fabrication technologies (Oxman, 2009;Demir, 2020) are explored in relation to form. Kolarevic (2003) emphasizes the reduction of distance between design and production through the direct transfer of design information in the fabrication equipment (Scheurer et al, 2005;Bayram et al, 2023). To understand the design approaches of this era, it is helpful to consider the emerging organic paradigm.…”

Section: Figure 2 (Next Page)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Mimari Formun Evrim Anlatısı ve Canlı Form Hali

UÇKAN,

DURSUN,

ÖZSOY

2023

Journal of Computational Design

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The concept of form in architectural design has been debated since prehistoric times. In its most straightforward meaning, form can be defined as the shape, shell, and inhabited volume of a structure. This study aims to explore the historical process of the transformation and evolution of form, as well as to discover new meanings and potentials of form through analysis, and to develop a critical perspective on form. The study is structured around three main axes. In the first stage, a mapping is designed to analyze the evolution of form throughout history. This mapping focuses on the changes in the approach to form, design, and making techniques chronologically. This stage reveals that form is no longer merely a final product represented by drawings or statically produced, but rather a concept that involves process and dynamism in a temporal-spatial dimension, whether in its design or production. In the second stage, the evolution of form is discussed through a new concept called ‘vital form’. While form represents something static or stationary, vital form signifies a dynamic and fluid state. While form is symbolically designed or produced by the designer from top to bottom, vital form represents a bottom-up, autonomous state formed by the influence of actors involved in design or production. Subsequently, the relationships, transitions, interactions, and changes between form and vital form, as well as their interpretations, are discussed within the proposed model in the study, based on conceptual sets derived from theoretical debates and the implications in design and making processes. It is believed that such exploration and awareness of form in architecture will bring new dimensions to the contemporary understanding, design, and making practices of form.

show abstract

Section: Figure 2 (Next Page)mentioning

confidence: 99%