2017
DOI: 10.4305/metu.jfa.2016.2.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mimarlığın Metinsel Temsilinde Retorik İnşa: Usûl-İ Mi’mârî-İ Osmanî

Abstract: Son dönemlerde, mimarlık yazımında yeni eğilimler gündemdedir. Yeniden okuma denemeleri; yüklemiş olduğu anlam farklılıkları, disiplinler arası yaklaşım biçimleri, özgünlüğü ve farklı bakış açıları ile araştırma malzemesinin bugüne kadar ele alındığından farklı bir metodolojik kurgu ve iddia ile kendini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu yönüyle yeniden okuma çalışmaları, malzemesine özel bir önem atfeden yaratıcı bir yorumlama girişimi olarak değerlendirilebilir.Mimarlık düşüncesi ve mimarlık-tarihyazımı ilişkisini kurma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Historiography as an activity of reconstruction, is evaluated in terms of three main approaches such as constructive, reconstructive and deconstructive. Reconstructivist approach that has been deriven from the constructivism, suggests that history can be known and re-written as it originally was, while the deconstructivist movement lead by a group of writers such as Jacques Derrida, Hayden White, Keith Jenkins, has construes the act of reading historical events and boundaries of the documents as an act of reconstruction (Durmuş, Öymen Gür, 2017). According to the traditional perspective, what comes to mind in terms of text is the written word.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historiography as an activity of reconstruction, is evaluated in terms of three main approaches such as constructive, reconstructive and deconstructive. Reconstructivist approach that has been deriven from the constructivism, suggests that history can be known and re-written as it originally was, while the deconstructivist movement lead by a group of writers such as Jacques Derrida, Hayden White, Keith Jenkins, has construes the act of reading historical events and boundaries of the documents as an act of reconstruction (Durmuş, Öymen Gür, 2017). According to the traditional perspective, what comes to mind in terms of text is the written word.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In academic literature, Usûl is considered a fundamental text for demonstrating the evolution of historical consciousness and the development of an evolutionary scheme for the history of Ottoman architecture (Baydar 2004, 22;Baydar Nalbantoglu 1989, 60-66;Ersoy 2007, 117 and2015, 4;Necipoglu 2007;Tanju 2007;Tanyeli 1990, 24;Yazıcı 2003, 12-19). Likely the earliest rhetorical text on Ottoman architecture (Durmuş and Gür 2017), Usûl is supposed to have had two crucial functions: the legitimization of Ottoman architecture as a unique historical phenomenon in reaction to the claims of some Western art historians (Necipoglu 2007, 143) and the proposition of a linear evolution of Ottoman architecture akin to Vignola's classical orders within Greek architecture. Usûl articulated this evolutionary scheme through scaled drawings of Ottoman buildings and their ornamentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not a new term and takes its roots from antiquity. However, it is constantly updated due to its potential and its meaning may evolve in different directions (Durmus, 2014). Reading and writing the city are an urban interest that aim to reveal the rhetorical relationship between narrative and architecture and its expression (Durmus Ozturk, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%