Miłość i samotność - konfrontacje

Domeracki, Piotr

doi:10.14746/fc.2014.11.03

2014

DOI: 10.14746/fc.2014.11.03

|View full text |Cite

Miłość i samotność - konfrontacje

Piotr Domeracki

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite1

Independent0

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…I discuss the issue of love as the contradiction and remedy for loneliness separately, pointing out and discussing the doubts associated with this kind of approach in the article:Domeracki P. (2014). Miłość i samotność -konfrontacje [Love and Loneliness -Confrontations].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Between Monolectical and Dialectical Philosophy of Loneliness and Communitiveness

Domeracki

2020

PCh

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is commonly known that maybe less solitude but more loneliness deserves on clear and firm criticism while communitiveness is assessed in a univocally positive way. This, in turn, translates to an unquestionable preference to ideas, feelings, motives and acts which are of community character and use. On the other hand, loneliness is recognised as a reason of our pain, suffering, fears, sadness and horrible despair. It results that our key ambition, need and aim should be avoiding and preventing each form of solitude or loneliness in our private and social life at all costs. But, as it occurs, this causes a lot of further -not only theoretical but unfortunately also practical -problems, which some researchers and ordinary people must face. This kind of unilateral and unambiguous interpretation of both solitude/loneliness and communitiveness I used to call 'monolectical'. In my presentation I am going to show that 'monolectics' of communitiveness or solitude/loneliness is insufficient for possibly objective and complete picture of this two. In consequence I will be arguing that monoseological discourse is able to gain it and to develop itself only by

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Between Monolectical and Dialectical Philosophy of Loneliness and Communitiveness

Domeracki

2020

PCh

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Miłość i samotność - konfrontacje

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Between Monolectical and Dialectical Philosophy of Loneliness and Communitiveness

Between Monolectical and Dialectical Philosophy of Loneliness and Communitiveness

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About