2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72121-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Millennial climate oscillations controlled the structure and evolution of Termination II

Abstract: The controls that affect the structure and timing of terminations are still poorly understood. We studied a tufa deposit from the Iberian Peninsula that covers Termination II (T-II) and whose chronology was synchronized to speleothem records. We used the same chronology to synchronize ocean sediments from the North Atlantic to correlate major climate events in a common timescale. We identify two stages within T-II. The first stage started with the increase of boreal summer integrated solar insolation, and duri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, based on the climate model results, a sustained weak AMOC during the middle and later stages was more critical to the peak Antarctic temperature during deglaciation. Even if the AMOC experienced strong modes in the early stage of the deglaciation, possibly corresponding to the observed climate fluctuations 54 , 55 , Antarctic temperature reached a similar thermal maximum in the late stage of the deglaciation (Supplementary Fig. S6 g).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, based on the climate model results, a sustained weak AMOC during the middle and later stages was more critical to the peak Antarctic temperature during deglaciation. Even if the AMOC experienced strong modes in the early stage of the deglaciation, possibly corresponding to the observed climate fluctuations 54 , 55 , Antarctic temperature reached a similar thermal maximum in the late stage of the deglaciation (Supplementary Fig. S6 g).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…S6 f). In particular, the AMOC oscillated twice during the early stage of T2 (135–133 ka), possibly corresponding to the abrupt climate changes recorded by dust concentrations in an Antarctic ice core from Dome Fuji 34 or the abrupt changes in the methane record and SSTs in the North Atlantic before 133 ka 4 , 54 , 55 . The stronger AMOC in the early stage of the deglaciation was likely because of the orbital parameters and atmospheric CO 2 forcing, which tend to warm temperatures over the North Atlantic and the Antarctic region.…”
Section: Results Of Transient Climate Model Deglaciation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude and duration of the modeled HS considered data from the North Atlantic off the Iberian Peninsula and the Mediterranean during the Late Pleistocene (Cacho et al, 1999;Pérez-Folgado, et al, 2003;Essallami et al, 2007;Martrat et al, 2007;Castaneda et al, 2010;Voelker and de Abreu, 2011). The hypothetical HS that we reproduce does not consider HSs that occurred during terminations, as their duration, evolution, and climate conditions often differ from HSs that occur during full-glacial climate conditions (e.g., Denton et al, 2006;Domínguez-Villar et al, 2020). We assume that the continents and sea surface recorded similar thermal anomalies.…”
Section: Surface Air Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domínguez-Villar et al (2021) follow by suggesting a modeling approach on speleothem records. They show that with increasing cave depth, the HE surface temperature anomaly is attenuated, and the lag time to build up a corresponding signal increases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%