2014
DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2014.888331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mill on Happiness: A question of method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Twelve years later, the contrast between 'traditional' and 'revisionist' interpretations of J. S. Mill's thought was cemented (Gray 1979). Importantly, the debate still lingers on (see the exchange between Brown 2010; Miller 2010; See also Loizides 2013bLoizides , 2014bMillgram 2019;Hansson 2022).…”
Section: On Social Freedom and J S Mill's Receptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twelve years later, the contrast between 'traditional' and 'revisionist' interpretations of J. S. Mill's thought was cemented (Gray 1979). Importantly, the debate still lingers on (see the exchange between Brown 2010; Miller 2010; See also Loizides 2013bLoizides , 2014bMillgram 2019;Hansson 2022).…”
Section: On Social Freedom and J S Mill's Receptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 33 For this term, see Loizides (2014), 306, and Scarre (1999), 500. Scarre (1996), 95, suggests an alternative account, according to which Mill refrains from criticizing Hedonism in order to avoid undermining the public’s commitment to “utilitarian ideals.” However, given the threat to that commitment posed by its association with a “pig philosophy” (Carlyle (1850), 268-270), absent considerations of filial piety, it would surely have been much easier for a Non-Hedonist Mill to have defended those ideals by breaking the association entirely.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%