Abstract:Conflicts of interest The author has made the following disclosures: SJF has researched cell therapy for liver fibrosis in pre-clinical models. SJF has previously been involved in a study of cell therapy for liver cirrhosis (REALISTIC) and is currently conducting a study of cell therapy for liver cirrhosis.
“…There is increasing concern regarding the backlog of endoscopy procedures and the impact that the delay related to COVID-19 will have upon patient health. While providers anticipate adding weekday and weekend hours [ 1 ], this limited resource should be utilized on those patients most in need [ 12 ]. Prior work suggests that cessation of services may result in a significant increase in advanced malignancies such as gastrointestinal disease, due the backlog of procedures delaying necessary screening and surveillance compounded by patients’ dismissing symptoms (including change in bowel habits, fatigue and weight loss) as “trivial” during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a need to conserve vital healthcare resources including personal protective equipment, protect healthcare personnel and maintain social distancing, gastroenterology societies recommended the delay of elective procedures at the onset of the pandemic. In gastroenterology, nearly all practices adopted this policy which resulted in a rapid and dramatic reduction in gastrointestinal endoscopy clinical volume [ 1 , 2 ]. Similarly, most practices now anticipate a very slow reintroduction of clinical volume as restrictions are lifted.…”
Background COVID-19 has caused a backlog of endoscopic procedures; colonoscopy must now be prioritized to those who would benefit most. We determined the proportion of screening and surveillance colonoscopies appropriate for rescheduling to a future year through strict adoption of US Multi-Society Task Force (USMSTF) guidelines. Methods We conducted a single-center observational study of patients scheduled for "open-access colonoscopy"-ordered by a primary care provider without being seen in gastroenterology clinic-over a 6-week period during the COVID-19 pandemic. Each chart was reviewed to appropriately assign a surveillance year per USMSTF guidelines including demographics, colonoscopy history and family history. When guidelines recommended a range of colonoscopy intervals, both a "conservative" and "liberal" guideline adherence were assessed. Results We delayed 769 "open-access" screening or surveillance colonoscopies due to COVID-19. Between 14.8% (conservative) and 20.7% (liberal), colonoscopies were appropriate for rescheduling to a future year. Conversely, 415 (54.0%) patients were overdue for colonoscopy. Family history of CRC was associated with being scheduled too early for both screening (OR 3.9; CI 1.9-8.2) and surveillance colonoscopy (OR 2.6, CI 1.0-6.5). The most common reasons a colonoscopy was inappropriately scheduled this year were failure to use new surveillance colonoscopy intervals (28.9%), incorrectly applied family history guidelines (27.2%) and recommending early surveillance colonoscopy after recent normal colonoscopy (19.3%). Conclusion Up to one-fifth of patients scheduled for "open-access" colonoscopy can be rescheduled into a future year based on USMSTF guidelines. Rigorously applying guidelines could judiciously allocate colonoscopy resources as we recover from the COVID-19 pandemic.
“…There is increasing concern regarding the backlog of endoscopy procedures and the impact that the delay related to COVID-19 will have upon patient health. While providers anticipate adding weekday and weekend hours [ 1 ], this limited resource should be utilized on those patients most in need [ 12 ]. Prior work suggests that cessation of services may result in a significant increase in advanced malignancies such as gastrointestinal disease, due the backlog of procedures delaying necessary screening and surveillance compounded by patients’ dismissing symptoms (including change in bowel habits, fatigue and weight loss) as “trivial” during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a need to conserve vital healthcare resources including personal protective equipment, protect healthcare personnel and maintain social distancing, gastroenterology societies recommended the delay of elective procedures at the onset of the pandemic. In gastroenterology, nearly all practices adopted this policy which resulted in a rapid and dramatic reduction in gastrointestinal endoscopy clinical volume [ 1 , 2 ]. Similarly, most practices now anticipate a very slow reintroduction of clinical volume as restrictions are lifted.…”
Background COVID-19 has caused a backlog of endoscopic procedures; colonoscopy must now be prioritized to those who would benefit most. We determined the proportion of screening and surveillance colonoscopies appropriate for rescheduling to a future year through strict adoption of US Multi-Society Task Force (USMSTF) guidelines. Methods We conducted a single-center observational study of patients scheduled for "open-access colonoscopy"-ordered by a primary care provider without being seen in gastroenterology clinic-over a 6-week period during the COVID-19 pandemic. Each chart was reviewed to appropriately assign a surveillance year per USMSTF guidelines including demographics, colonoscopy history and family history. When guidelines recommended a range of colonoscopy intervals, both a "conservative" and "liberal" guideline adherence were assessed. Results We delayed 769 "open-access" screening or surveillance colonoscopies due to COVID-19. Between 14.8% (conservative) and 20.7% (liberal), colonoscopies were appropriate for rescheduling to a future year. Conversely, 415 (54.0%) patients were overdue for colonoscopy. Family history of CRC was associated with being scheduled too early for both screening (OR 3.9; CI 1.9-8.2) and surveillance colonoscopy (OR 2.6, CI 1.0-6.5). The most common reasons a colonoscopy was inappropriately scheduled this year were failure to use new surveillance colonoscopy intervals (28.9%), incorrectly applied family history guidelines (27.2%) and recommending early surveillance colonoscopy after recent normal colonoscopy (19.3%). Conclusion Up to one-fifth of patients scheduled for "open-access" colonoscopy can be rescheduled into a future year based on USMSTF guidelines. Rigorously applying guidelines could judiciously allocate colonoscopy resources as we recover from the COVID-19 pandemic.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.