2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Milk and Dairy Consumption and Risk of Bladder Cancer: A Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…smokingYu et al [26]Coffee9 COHDrinkers versus none/lowestYes (MMA)RR 0.83; 95 % CI 0.73–0.949I 2  = 39.3 %Egger p  = 0.793Wu et al [29]Coffee34 CC6 COHHigh versus lowYes (MMA)RRms = 1.28; 95 % CI 1.21–1.4618Most adjusted, incl. smokingI 2  = 28.5Egger p  = 0.051Boyle et al [30]Sweetened carbonated beverages5 studiesHigh versus lowYesRR 1.13; 95 % CI 0.89–1.455I 2  = 0.0 %Egger p  = 0.05Li et al [135]MilkDairy products12 CC6 COHMilk; high versus lowYesRRm = 0.91; 95 % CI 0.72–1.157Most adjustedQ p  = 0.020Egger p  = 0.048Dairy products; high versus lowYesRRm = 1.01; 95 % CI 0.86–1.193Most adjustedQ p  = 0.108Egger p  = 0.73Mao et al [31]Milk and Dairy products8 HCC5 PCC6 COHAll milk; high versus lowNoRRms = 0.84; 95 % CI 0.72–0.9716Most adjusted, incl. smokingI 2  = 70.1 %Egger p  = 0.055Whole milk; high versus lowNoRR 2.23; 95 % CI 1.45–3.002I 2  = 0…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…smokingYu et al [26]Coffee9 COHDrinkers versus none/lowestYes (MMA)RR 0.83; 95 % CI 0.73–0.949I 2  = 39.3 %Egger p  = 0.793Wu et al [29]Coffee34 CC6 COHHigh versus lowYes (MMA)RRms = 1.28; 95 % CI 1.21–1.4618Most adjusted, incl. smokingI 2  = 28.5Egger p  = 0.051Boyle et al [30]Sweetened carbonated beverages5 studiesHigh versus lowYesRR 1.13; 95 % CI 0.89–1.455I 2  = 0.0 %Egger p  = 0.05Li et al [135]MilkDairy products12 CC6 COHMilk; high versus lowYesRRm = 0.91; 95 % CI 0.72–1.157Most adjustedQ p  = 0.020Egger p  = 0.048Dairy products; high versus lowYesRRm = 1.01; 95 % CI 0.86–1.193Most adjustedQ p  = 0.108Egger p  = 0.73Mao et al [31]Milk and Dairy products8 HCC5 PCC6 COHAll milk; high versus lowNoRRms = 0.84; 95 % CI 0.72–0.9716Most adjusted, incl. smokingI 2  = 70.1 %Egger p  = 0.055Whole milk; high versus lowNoRR 2.23; 95 % CI 1.45–3.002I 2  = 0…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bladder cancer is the fourth most common solid tumor in males and the seventh most common solid tumor in females, globally (1). According to statistics published in 2012, the number of new bladder cancer cases in the world reached 430,000, and the number of mortalities caused by bladder cancer reached 165,000 (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between-studies heterogeneity was measured using the Q statistic. P<0.10 was regarded as significantly heterogeneous and random effects models were used for analyses estimating the pooled RR, 95% confidence intervals, and corresponding p-values for heterogeneity, otherwise, fixed effects models were used 16 . I 2 statistic was also applied to measure the percentage of the total variation across studies caused by heterogeneity 17,18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we set p = 0.1 as our statistical penalty in these two tests. P<0.1 indicated possible publication bias 16 . All statistical analyses were using the commands in the Stata statistical software package (version, 11.0, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%