1980
DOI: 10.1177/001872088002200202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Military Research on Performance Criteria: A Change of Emphasis

Abstract: This paper discusses trends in development and use of performance measures to meet complex needs of the U.S. Army. Examples from the programs of the Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences include typical major criteria of individual effectiveness (school grades, ratings, performance tests); measures of unit effectiveness more recently developed (tactical engagement simulation); and measures dealing with human factors problems encountered in systems analysis in the Army. The way in which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus of their review, across the disciplines, was on five aspects of performance measurement: purpose, source, criteria, standards for performance measures, and methods of measurement. Earlier work by Chiles (1967), Uhlaner (1972; Uhlaner & Drucker, 1964, 1980), and Meister (1985) is often ignored by I-O researchers, but it provides a useful emphasis on person-machine and system concepts that are becoming increasingly useful with work place technology innovations (i.e., Workplace 2000; Johnston & Packer, 1987). Meister (1985) and Uhlaner (1972) presented several implications of a systems focus for criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of their review, across the disciplines, was on five aspects of performance measurement: purpose, source, criteria, standards for performance measures, and methods of measurement. Earlier work by Chiles (1967), Uhlaner (1972; Uhlaner & Drucker, 1964, 1980), and Meister (1985) is often ignored by I-O researchers, but it provides a useful emphasis on person-machine and system concepts that are becoming increasingly useful with work place technology innovations (i.e., Workplace 2000; Johnston & Packer, 1987). Meister (1985) and Uhlaner (1972) presented several implications of a systems focus for criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%