1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02569045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Military ophthalmology in the Vietnam War

Abstract: This overview of the practice of military ophthalmology by US army ophthalmologists during the Vietnam War focuses on administrative management of eye and adnexal injuries, care of the wounded military and of Vietnamese civilians, and research activities. It concludes with improvements that have been subsequently adopted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among our patients, despite the high rate of all ocular injuries, the rate of primary enucleations was 5.8% (four cases). This again is consistent with previous reports of a decreasing rate of eye removal: 20% during the war in Vietnam [20], fewer than 15% in the 1982 war in the Middle East [2], 18% during Operation Desert Storm [21], and fewer than 13% in the present conflict in Iraq [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Among our patients, despite the high rate of all ocular injuries, the rate of primary enucleations was 5.8% (four cases). This again is consistent with previous reports of a decreasing rate of eye removal: 20% during the war in Vietnam [20], fewer than 15% in the 1982 war in the Middle East [2], 18% during Operation Desert Storm [21], and fewer than 13% in the present conflict in Iraq [10].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…According to the previously reported studies, there was a decreasing rate of enucleation/evisceration: 20% in the Vietnam War, 18% in the Operation Desert Storm, and less than 13% in the conflict in Iraq. [22][23][24] Consistent with the recent studies the rate of primary eviscerations was 9.3% in our study. 7,16 There are several limitations of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…With these adaptations in military tactics, injury patterns sustained by combatants have also changed. For example, the incidence of ocular injuries has increased during combat from 0.65% of all injuries during the Crimean war of 1854-1856 to 13% during Operation Desert Storm in 1991 [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Multiple explanations have been proposed for these changes, including the use of explosive fragmentation from artillery and aircraft rather than low-velocity projectiles shot from muzzle-loading rifles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%