2013
DOI: 10.3113/jsoa.2013.0066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Military Movement Training Program Improves Jump-Landing Mechanics Associated With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk

Abstract: As part of the physical education program at the United States Military Academy, all cadets complete a movement training course designed to develop skills and improve performance in military-related physical tasks as well as obstacle navigation. The purpose of this study was to determine if completion of this course would also result in changes in jump-landing technique that reduce the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Analysis of landing mechanics on a two-footed jump landing from a height of 3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is possible that the cadets assigned to the DIME program did not have enough exposures to result in changes during the intervention period but that continued exposure to movement training during the course helped facilitate the changes observed. While Owens et al 12 observed improved LESS scores and increased landing time in military cadets after completing this course, we do not believe that the military movement course alone resulted in the VGRF changes in the current study. Both groups (SWU, DIME) completed the military movement course at the same time, but the SWU did not result in the same reductions in VGRF.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Therefore, it is possible that the cadets assigned to the DIME program did not have enough exposures to result in changes during the intervention period but that continued exposure to movement training during the course helped facilitate the changes observed. While Owens et al 12 observed improved LESS scores and increased landing time in military cadets after completing this course, we do not believe that the military movement course alone resulted in the VGRF changes in the current study. Both groups (SWU, DIME) completed the military movement course at the same time, but the SWU did not result in the same reductions in VGRF.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Researchers are starting to address these requirements. For example, Owens et al (117) found that a military movement training program was effective in improving jump-landing mechanics as measured by the LESS, but reductions in injury were not determined. Also Kiesel et al (71) found that training programs focused on enhancing functional movement improved FMS scores during the off season for athletes in the NFL, but again, whether these functional improvements actually reduced injury rates and/or time lost to training was not determined.…”
Section: Preventing Injury Through Functional Movement Assessment Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 The kinetics and kinematics of the involved joints are related to the attenuation of ground reaction forces and energy absorption. 17,18 By improving lower extremity energy absorption 19 and landing mechanics, 20 researchers and trainers seek to reduce ACL and other injuries like ankle sprains. 21 There are some training protocols to improve balance and landing mechanics based on some particular points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%