2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mild traumatic brain injury: Is DTI ready for the courtroom?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in that study, handedness was not considered and age was not thoroughly matched. By contrast, we recruited the age-, sex-, and handedness-matched control subjects in accordance with the recommendation of Shenton et al, although we employed the same statistical method (Bayesian statistics) in the present study [13]. In addition, to confirm the presence of narrowing in our configurational analysis, we measured the STT areas of the patients and the control subjects and confirmed the presence of significant differences by using Bayesian-based statistical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, in that study, handedness was not considered and age was not thoroughly matched. By contrast, we recruited the age-, sex-, and handedness-matched control subjects in accordance with the recommendation of Shenton et al, although we employed the same statistical method (Bayesian statistics) in the present study [13]. In addition, to confirm the presence of narrowing in our configurational analysis, we measured the STT areas of the patients and the control subjects and confirmed the presence of significant differences by using Bayesian-based statistical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As a result, the DTT method appears to be more effective than the DTI method when attempting to detect TAI in an individual patient [8]. However, methods for detecting the TAI of neural tracts in mTBI have not been fully established, although a few methods, such as DTT parameter measurement, configurational analysis, and DTI parameter measurement using ROIs, have been suggested [7,8,[11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analyses for functional connectivity between brain areas are also helpful in diagnosing mild cognitive impairment (Lin, Xing, & Han, 2018), lateral sclerosis (Clark et al, 2018), addiction (Zare Sadeghi et al, 2017), and many other conditions (Du, Fu, & Calhoun, 2018). Structural MRI such as diffusion tensor imaging helps assess Parkinson disease (Schwarz et al, 2014), Alzheimer disease (Kantarci et al, 2017), mesial temporal sclerosis (Corrêa et al, 2018), brain injury (Shenton, Price, Levin, & Edersheim, 2018), and for differentiating tumors and demyelinating diseases from normal tissues (Giussani et al, 2010). Similarly, volumetric MRI can help in distinguishing the addiction-related (Keihani et al, 2017) and sedentary lifestyle-related (Batouli & Saba, 2020) abnormalities of the brain, as well as in imaging genetics , schizophrenia (de Moura et al, 2018), migraine (Coppola et al, 2017), and epilepsy (Quan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural imaging such as computer tomography (CT) and conventional MRI (T1‐weighted and T2‐weighted) have essentially been inefficient to help with the diagnosis of mTBI. Other neuroimaging methods such as functional MRI (task‐based MRI and resting state MRI; e.g., Chen, Johnston, Collie, McCrory, & Ptito, 2007; Mayer et al, 2015), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) (Shenton, Price, Levin, & Edersheim, 2018), susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI; Lu, Cao, Wei, Li, & Li, 2015; Studerus‐Germann, Thiran, Daducci, & Gautschi, 2016), perfusion weighted imaging (PWI; Andre, 2015; Hamer, Churchill, Hutchison, Graham, & Schweizer, 2020; Clark et al, 2020), positron emission tomography (PET) (Jensen & Lauritzen, 2019; Raji & Henderson, 2018), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (Amen et al, 2016; Romero, Lobaugh, Black, Ehrlich, & Feinstein, 2015) have shown promise, but even then the results have been mixed with a more common utilization in the research environment and a slower integration in the clinical setting due to cost and a lack of a standardization of the procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%