2002
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.01417.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mild cognitive impairment1– a review of prevalence, incidence and outcome according to current approaches

Abstract: As there is no construct to date that pools all efforts of defining mild cognitive impairment, the review provides suggestions for an agreement on constructive terminology and research practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
163
0
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(176 reference statements)
5
163
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is not full consensus on the definition of a low memory score (Bennett, 2003;Dubois et al, 2007;Luis et al, 2003), many clinicians and researchers consider an age-and educationadjusted score that is at least 1.5 standard deviations (SDs) below the mean to be unusually low and sufficient to meet psychometric criteria for amnestic MCI (see two recent consensus papers: Gauthier et al, 2006;Portet et al, 2006). There has been consistent evidence that individuals with amnestic MCI (i.e., both single and multiple domain amnestic MCI) are at a significantly higher risk of progressing to dementia (10-15% per annum) than those with normal cognitive functioning (Bennett, 2003;Bischkopf et al, 2002;Bruscoli & Lovestone, 2004;DeCarli, 2003;Luis et al, 2003;Modrego, 2006;Panza et al, 2005;Shah et al, 2000;Smith et al, 2006;Tuokko & Frerichs, 2000). However, MCI remains a challenging entity to define and provide prognosis for on an individual basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is not full consensus on the definition of a low memory score (Bennett, 2003;Dubois et al, 2007;Luis et al, 2003), many clinicians and researchers consider an age-and educationadjusted score that is at least 1.5 standard deviations (SDs) below the mean to be unusually low and sufficient to meet psychometric criteria for amnestic MCI (see two recent consensus papers: Gauthier et al, 2006;Portet et al, 2006). There has been consistent evidence that individuals with amnestic MCI (i.e., both single and multiple domain amnestic MCI) are at a significantly higher risk of progressing to dementia (10-15% per annum) than those with normal cognitive functioning (Bennett, 2003;Bischkopf et al, 2002;Bruscoli & Lovestone, 2004;DeCarli, 2003;Luis et al, 2003;Modrego, 2006;Panza et al, 2005;Shah et al, 2000;Smith et al, 2006;Tuokko & Frerichs, 2000). However, MCI remains a challenging entity to define and provide prognosis for on an individual basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average incidence rate of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is 12-15 per 1,000 person years in persons aged 65 and older [2]. The conversion rate from MCI to dementia is 14 % annually [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Memory problems, for example, may begin as early as age 30 and, on the average, worsen slowly but steadily thereafter (1). Most older adults experience nonpathological losses in cognitive function, frequently called ''age-related cognitive decline'' (ARCD) (2)(3)(4); however, there is considerable interindividual variability in the age of onset and the course of memory or other cognitive loss (5,6). Although ARCD does not profoundly affect real-world function, even modest reductions in cognitive function negatively impact the quality of life, independence, frequency and quality of social interaction, and engagement in cognitively stimulating activities in older adults.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%