2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05155-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mild Cognitive Impairment and Receipt of Treatments for Acute Myocardial Infarction in Older Adults

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) should receive evidence-based treatments when indicated. Providers and patients may overestimate the risk of dementia in patients with MCI leading to potential under-treatment. However, the association between pre-existing MCI and receipt of evidence-based treatments is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To compare receipt of treatments for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between older adults with pre-existing MCI and cognitively normal patients. DESIGN: Prosp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that pre-existing MCI was associated with lower likelihood of receiving invasive treatments (e.g., cardiac catheterization and coronary revascularization) after AMI. [11,12] The association between patient MCI and receipt of non-invasive treatments such as cardiac rehabilitation is unclear but one study has found lower likelihood of physician referral and patient participation in cardiac rehabilitation. [11] Differences in use of secondary preventive medications after AIS and AMI are also unclear with one study finding similar use of AMI medications by cognitive status.…”
Section: Theme Exemplar Quotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have shown that pre-existing MCI was associated with lower likelihood of receiving invasive treatments (e.g., cardiac catheterization and coronary revascularization) after AMI. [11,12] The association between patient MCI and receipt of non-invasive treatments such as cardiac rehabilitation is unclear but one study has found lower likelihood of physician referral and patient participation in cardiac rehabilitation. [11] Differences in use of secondary preventive medications after AIS and AMI are also unclear with one study finding similar use of AMI medications by cognitive status.…”
Section: Theme Exemplar Quotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] Yet evidence suggests older adults with MCI get fewer established, effective treatments after AMI than those with normal cognition. [11,12] It is unknown how a patient's MCI influences physician decision-making and recommendations for AIS and AMI treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39][40][41] Female gender, minority status, and to some extent, younger age are associated with lower likelihood of receiving medication therapy for conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, asthma, HF, and HIV infections. A recent study by Levine et al 42 found that older adults who have mild cognitive impairment and who experienced a myocardial infarction were less likely to receive cardiac catheterization, coronary revascularization, and cardiac rehabilitation. Likewise, people with severe mental illness also receive lower rates of invasive coronary interventions after a cardiac event.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few studies that have examined CI as a predictor of outcomes have reported mixed results. 7,12,13 Importantly, prior studies often used measures of cognition collected prior to or after, not during, acute myocardial infarction hospitalization, 7,12,14 and thus did not characterize cognitive status during admission, during which treatment decisions are made and important information about disease management is communicated to patients. The objective of this study was, therefore, to examine the association of cognition, measured during hospitalization, with risk of mortality and readmissions at 6 months post-discharge in a large prospective sample of acute myocardial infarction patients ages 75 years and older.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%