BackgroundSubjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) experience alterations of functional parameters, such as impaired balance or gait. The current systematic review set out to investigate whether functional objective performance may predict a future risk of MCI; to compare functional objective parameters in confirmed MCI people with a control group; and to assess longitudinal changes in these parameters after different physical interventions.MethodsA systematic review of relevant literature was conducted. Literature were searched in PubMed, AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro and Web of Science as well as grey literature databases. Cohort studies and Randimized Controlled Trials (RCTs) were included. Quality of reviewed studies were assessed independently by reviewers using quality assessment checklists.ResultsFifteen studies met inclusion criteria including mild cognitive impairment people. Results from RCTs suggested that gait speed, gait variability and balance may be improved by different physical interventions. Cohort studies showed that gait speed, gait variability and gait symmetry, especially in Dual Task (DT) conditions, were parameters impaired in confirmed MCI patients in comparison with a Control Gorup. Furthermore, cohort studies suggested that gait variability could be a predictor of MCI. However, RCTs showed an unclear risk of bias and all studies included in this systematic review had a low quality of evidence.ConclusionsExisting studies suggest that gait variability may predict incident MCI, moreover different gait parameters, especially during DT conditions, could be impaired in MCI. These parameters could be improved by some interventions. Further studies are required to refute our findings.