2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

miHA-Match: Computational detection of tissue-specific minor histocompatibility antigens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, proteasomal cleavage and transporter associated with antigen processing transport efficiency has been combined with reverse computational approaches to optimize the selection of candidate epitopes [88]. Feldhahn et al described a different approach for large-scale detection of tissue-specific miHA [89] that uses netMHCpan, a high-throughput computational method for quantitative predictions of peptide binding to any HLA-A and -B locus protein of known sequence [90]. …”
Section: Classification Of Tumor Antigensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, proteasomal cleavage and transporter associated with antigen processing transport efficiency has been combined with reverse computational approaches to optimize the selection of candidate epitopes [88]. Feldhahn et al described a different approach for large-scale detection of tissue-specific miHA [89] that uses netMHCpan, a high-throughput computational method for quantitative predictions of peptide binding to any HLA-A and -B locus protein of known sequence [90]. …”
Section: Classification Of Tumor Antigensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2010 ) to construct all polymorphic epitopes. This pipeline can be used to identify minor histocompatibility antigens ( Feldhahn et al. , 2012 ) or neoepitopes, which are of high interest in cancer vaccine design ( Kyzirakos et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus matching the HLA types [ 31 ] between non-identical twins improves the rate of graft transplantation, but HLA typing methods are not precise due to complexity and polymorphism of MHC molecules [ 32 ]. Another reason is differences in minor histocompatibility antigens (MHA) that also vary in individuals for HLA type matching, which is a consideration in assessing graft rejection [ 33 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Immunological Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indirect pathway is evidence of the conventional antigen processing and presentation by APCs. Even though the indirect pathway represents specificity, the rejection is also very often due to minor H antigen loci differences [ 10 , 33 ].…”
Section: Immunological Rejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%