2000
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020<0041:mbafdo>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migratory Behavior and Forebay Delay of Radio-Tagged Juvenile Fall Chinook Salmon in a Lower Snake River Impoundment

Abstract: During July and August 1995-1997, we used radiotelemetry to estimate the migration rate of 405 juvenile fall chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (mean fork length, 138-144 mm) through Little Goose Reservoir. Migration rates decreased significantly as fish approached the dam. Median migration rates in 1995 were 26.0 km/d through the 45.9-km reach immediately below Lower Granite Dam, 14.9 km/d through the next 14.4 km, and 0.8 km/d in the Little Goose Dam forebay (0.6 km). Median migration rates through the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
55
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the trap tends to create a slackwater environment immediately upriver, appropriate velocities may not have been prevalent in the vicinity of where juveniles were outmigrating to cue downriver movements. Similar delayed movements have been noted for juvenile salmonids outmigrating through impounded reaches of large river systems (Venditti et al 2000).…”
Section: Adfluvial Cutthroat Trout Migrationsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Because the trap tends to create a slackwater environment immediately upriver, appropriate velocities may not have been prevalent in the vicinity of where juveniles were outmigrating to cue downriver movements. Similar delayed movements have been noted for juvenile salmonids outmigrating through impounded reaches of large river systems (Venditti et al 2000).…”
Section: Adfluvial Cutthroat Trout Migrationsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…I regressed the average (all fish in a 15-min catch) consumption rates C against local predator density P using the logarithmic form of equation 2. Regressions did not include those transects where C was zero since I assumed that prey were likely unavailable to any of the predators when C was zero because of the patchy nature of migrating salmonids (Brege et al 1988;Venditti et al 2000;Petersen 2001;unpublished USGS data). This approach assumes that all predators in a local area would have approximately the same access to a patch of salmonids migrating through the river immediately prior to our sampling effort.…”
Section: Used Equation 2 As An Empirical Model Of Potential Interfementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most salmon were collected in water that was less than 3 m deep, although older fish may have moved offshore beyond the range of the beach seine. Juvenile salmonids often delay in the forebay of hydroelectric projects (Ruggles and Watt 1975;Venditti et al 2000), generally passing dams during night hours (e.g. Brege et al 1988), which likely creates diel pulses of prey in reservoirs.…”
Section: Compensatory Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pacific salmon and steelhead are highly migratory and provide clear examples of the effects of hydropower development on salmonid populations’ range [7], migratory behavior [1], [8], [9] and predator-prey interactions [10], [11]. Conversion of free-flowing rivers to impounded reservoirs alters the natural hydrograph, homogenizes habitat, increases water temperature and induces behavioral changes, including increased milling behavior near dam forebays [12] and slower migration rates [9]. Dams also create favorable conditions for piscine predators to congregate in slow-moving reservoir currents where they exploit migrating salmon and steelhead smolts [11], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%