Migrations and Borders: Practices and Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion in Europe from the Nineteenth to the Twenty-first Century

Abstract

Current media images of a "fortress Europe" suggest that migrations and borders are closely connected. This special issue brings together scholars from history, sociology and anthropology to explore crossborder mobility and migration during the formation, development, and transformation of the modern (nation-)state explicating the conflictive and fluctuating character of borders. The historical perspective demonstrates that such bordering processes are not new. However, they have developed new dynamics in different historical phases, from the formation of the modern (nation-)state in the nineteenth century to the creation of the European Union during the second half of the twentieth. This introduction explains the dynamic relationships between borders and migratory movements in Europe from the nineteenth century to the present by approaching them from four different, overlapping angles, which the articles analyze in more detail: (1) the multiple actors involved, (2) scales and places of borders and their crossings, (3) the instruments and techniques employed, and (4) the significance of social categories. Focusing on the historical, local specificity of the complex relations between migration and boundaries will help denaturalize the concept of the border as well as further reflection on the shifting definitions of migration and belonging.

Interventions in critical health geopolitics: Borders, rights, and conspiracies in the COVID-19 pandemic

“…More specifically, borders under neoliberalism enable certain mobilities (e.g., capital, trade flows, cheap labour) while excluding others (e.g., unwanted migrants) (Nevins, 2007). These accounts highlight the filtering capacity of borders (Fauser et al, 2019) and the arbitrary and often violent character of the state's bordering practices (Jones, 2016). Those theorisations highlight the injustice that borders cause in reducing certain individuals' freedoms (Casaglia, 2020).…”

(De-)legitimation of migration

“…As our study is set in Sweden at a time when it is increasingly difficult to be granted asylum, and many unsuccessful applicants are deported to unsafe situations and places (see chapter 5), the findings of our analysis are addressed while taking into account the inclusion/exclusion dichotomy that nation state borders imply (Fauser et al, 2019). This means that the discourses analysed correspond to either the inclusion or exclusion of asylum seekers like Sahar.…”