2006
DOI: 10.2307/25148771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migration to Open-Standard Interorganizational Systems: Network Effects, Switching Costs, and Path Dependency

Abstract: This study examines firms' migration across interorganizational systems (IOS) that are built on standards with relatively different degrees of openness. As firms seek to improve inter-firm coordination using adoption, yet the extant literature falls short of empirical testing of the theory. We examine our conceptual model on a large dataset of 1,394 firms. The empirical results demonstrate that network effects are a significant driver of migration to open-standard IOS. We also find that the effect of adoption … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
323
1
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 377 publications
(337 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
8
323
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, we implicitly consider both the benefits (more specifically: direct, indirect and strategic benefits; Chwelos et al, 2001;Iacovou et al, 1995;Jimenez-Martinez and Polo-Redondo, 2004;Weber and Kantamneni, 2002) and the costs of innovation processes, more specifically: relational costs (Allen et al, 2000;Hart and Saunders, 1998;Nakayama, 2000), development costs (Antonelli, 1994;Gupta et al, 2008), implementation costs (Irani and Love, 2000;2001) and switching costs (Zhu et al, 2006). According to this theoretical background, we adopt a case study approach (Yin, 1994), providing empirical descriptions of the logistic processes of the port of Salerno (situated in the south of Italy) and emphasizing the rich, real-world context in which the phenomena occur (Eisenhardt and Graebner, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we implicitly consider both the benefits (more specifically: direct, indirect and strategic benefits; Chwelos et al, 2001;Iacovou et al, 1995;Jimenez-Martinez and Polo-Redondo, 2004;Weber and Kantamneni, 2002) and the costs of innovation processes, more specifically: relational costs (Allen et al, 2000;Hart and Saunders, 1998;Nakayama, 2000), development costs (Antonelli, 1994;Gupta et al, 2008), implementation costs (Irani and Love, 2000;2001) and switching costs (Zhu et al, 2006). According to this theoretical background, we adopt a case study approach (Yin, 1994), providing empirical descriptions of the logistic processes of the port of Salerno (situated in the south of Italy) and emphasizing the rich, real-world context in which the phenomena occur (Eisenhardt and Graebner, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As IOS migrate toward more open Internet-based standards, IOS adopters face a much broader range of potential trading partners (Zhu et al, 2006). Open IOS standards facilitate industry-wide initiatives that lower costs for all network participants (Christiaanse, Van Diepen, & Damsgaard, 2004).…”
Section: New Theoretical Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next to these three papers there are several studies that can be seen as fundament for this area of expertise, however many have a different viewpoint, like for instance the economics of standardization. In our research focussed at improving the quality of transaction standards, a good fundament for the development viewpoint is the conceptual framework of Zhao et al [23], while the conceptual model of Zhu et al [25] is appropriate for the adoption viewpoint.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%