2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migration energy barriers and diffusion anisotropy of point defects on tungsten surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exploration by MD of the elementary events involved in the diffusion of nanocavities highlights the role of creating the pair of surface defects, detrapping ad-atom from a nanocavity vertex, and forming a cluster of surface vacancies. The fast surface diffusion of the ad-atom compared to the vacancy agrees with the migration energies calculated by DFT on (110) surface (Hao et al, 2020). It can be explained by the smaller coordination number of the ad-atom compared to the surface vacancy, which has an impact on the strength of the binding of the defect with the surface along its migration path.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Exploration by MD of the elementary events involved in the diffusion of nanocavities highlights the role of creating the pair of surface defects, detrapping ad-atom from a nanocavity vertex, and forming a cluster of surface vacancies. The fast surface diffusion of the ad-atom compared to the vacancy agrees with the migration energies calculated by DFT on (110) surface (Hao et al, 2020). It can be explained by the smaller coordination number of the ad-atom compared to the surface vacancy, which has an impact on the strength of the binding of the defect with the surface along its migration path.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…) 2 ] 1/2 , ∇ s is the surface gradient operator, Ω is the atomic volume of tungsten at temperature T, J s is the surface atomic mass flux, and J I is the SIA flux from the bulk of the nanobubble region toward the He-plasma-exposed surface along the z-direction. For the lateral dimensions of the surface, we have chosen the two Cartesian coordinates, x and y, to be oriented along the [1 10] and [001] crystallographic directions, respectively, because they correspond to the most stable high-symmetry directions for step edges on the W(110) surface [46,47]. In this model, dislocation loop formation and the loop punching process from helium bubbles in the nearsurface nanobubble region are approximated as a flux of SIAs toward the plasma-exposed surface.…”
Section: Surface Morphological Evolution Model For Pfc Tungstenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is used to explain the difference between square and spherical bcc iron nanoclusters depending on the condition (temperature and iron deposition) [41]: at low temperature and high iron deposition, (100) is favoured because of the high migration barrier of adatoms on (100) compared to (110). Similar to iron, the point defects on W surfaces, especially the adatoms, are more mobile on W(110) (≈1.0 eV) than on W(100) and W(111) (≈2.5 eV) [34]. Thus, depending on the temperature of formation of these dust particles, W(111) could be favoured over W(110).…”
Section: Surface Distributionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such a large quantity of tritium, with a low solubility of interstitial hydrogen, requires a high concentration of very deep defects (>1.5 eV of detrapping energy, i.e. vacancy-type defects [33,34]) coming from the dust production. Note that the bulk contribution, in the assumption of a homogeneous distribution of tritium, does not depend on the surface specific area (section 2.1).…”
Section: Impact Of the Bulk Of The Dust Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%