Migration and hedonic valuation: The case of air quality

Abstract

Conventional hedonic techniques for estimating the value of local amenities rely on the assumption that households move freely among locations. We show that when moving is costly, the variation in housing prices and wages across locations may no longer reflect the value of differences in local amenities. We develop an alternative discrete-choice approach that models the household location decision directly, and we apply it to the case of air quality in U.S. metro areas in 1990 and 2000. Because air pollution is likely to be correlated with unobservable local characteristics such as economic activity, we instrument for air quality using the contribution of distant sources to local pollution -excluding emissions from local sources, which are most likely to be correlated with local conditions. Our model yields an estimated elasticity of willingness to pay with respect to air quality of 0.34 to 0.42. These estimates imply that the median household would pay $149 to $185 (in constant 1982-1984 dollars) for a one-unit reduction in average ambient concentrations of particulate matter. These estimates are three times greater than the marginal willingness to pay estimated by a conventional hedonic model using the same data. Our results are robust to a range of covariates, instrumenting strategies, and functional form assumptions. The findings also confirm the importance of instrumenting for local air pollution.Keywords: Particulate matter, valuation of air quality, wage-hedonic models, migration costs, residential sorting, discrete choice models

The value of air quality and crime in Chile: a hedonic wage approach

“…In their model, the effects on the endogenous variables depend on a complex interaction of factors. Finally, Bayer et al (2009) introduce migration costs in the wage hedonic model, and show that failing to take account of these costs might lead to biased estimates of amenity prices. Ultimately, though, the estimation of the welfare measure is essentially the same as Roback (1982), and a pure consumption amenity is expected to have a positive price.…”

“…Furthermore, since some amenities are likely to be correlated with unobserved local economic factors that affect land prices, there is a potential endogeneity problem in the estimation of the model (Bayer et al, 2009). That is, individuals take decisions on living and working simultaneously, and this connects price determination in both markets.…”

Valuing Air Quality Using Happiness Data: The Case of China

“…There are three major approaches to valuing air quality: the hedonic approach (Smith and Huang 1995; Chattopadhyay 1999; Chay and Greenstone 2005; Bayer and Timmins 2009; Yusuf and Resosudarmo 2009), the contingent valuation method (CVM) (Alberini and Krupnick 1998; Kwak, Yoo and Kim 2001; Zhai and Suzuki 2008; Vasquez et al 2009; Wang, Xie and Li 2010; Wang et al 2013), and the happiness approach.…”

Are Green Cities Nice Places to Live? Examining the Link between Urban Sustainability and Quality of Life

“…The main impediment to progress in this matter can be attributed to two central challenges: first, there is the need for reliable data on nonmarket quantities, and second, there is the inherent difficulty of imputing prices for these nonmarket goods and services. While environmental economists have made progress on dealing with households' willingness to pay for specific amenities such as air quality (Chay and Greenstone 2005;Bayer, Keohane, and Timmins 2009;Muller, Mendelsohn, and Nordhaus 2011), a comprehensive set of "green" adjustments to NIPA (or a full set of green satellite accounts) remains elusive. 4.…”