“…As any of the aforementioned processes would have promoted additional crustal thickening, if sufficient in scale, they may have generated an appropriately large orogenic edifice to promote further frictional resistance and heightened coupling along the plate boundary (Iaffaldano & Bunge, ; Meade & Conrad, ). In fact, the central Andes may have reached a threshold condition, whereby mountain building became self reinforcing, with (a) the growth of sizeable topography and a thick hinterland backstop (Barnes & Ehlers, ; Oncken et al, ), (b) aridification of forearc regions and further starving of the trench (Lamb & Davis, ; Norton & Schlunegger, ; Strecker et al, ), and/or (c) cyclical buildup and removal of dense orogenic roots (DeCelles et al, , ). Although speculative, it is posited here that a late middle Eocene to earliest Miocene phase of flat slab subduction, which did not affect the southern Andes, provided a trigger for enhanced coupling and protracted contractional growth of the central Andes.…”