2011
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migrating deformation in the Central Andes from enhanced orographic rainfall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clustering of young (<15 Ma) AFT cooling ages in the central EC is a function of the active basement ramp, which is linked to shortening in the SAZ. Previous interpretations of this recent cooling expressed as young AFT ages include active deformation manifested as surface breaking faults or subsurface accretion (Norton & Schlunegger, ), focused erosion driven by an increase in precipitation (Barnes et al, ; Gillis et al, ; Lease & Ehlers, ), and uplift over a basement ramp (Whipple & Gasparini, ). Our modeling shows that the motion of crustal material over the basement sheet B ramp focuses 5–8 km of exhumation in this region resetting cooling signals in a westward younging pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The clustering of young (<15 Ma) AFT cooling ages in the central EC is a function of the active basement ramp, which is linked to shortening in the SAZ. Previous interpretations of this recent cooling expressed as young AFT ages include active deformation manifested as surface breaking faults or subsurface accretion (Norton & Schlunegger, ), focused erosion driven by an increase in precipitation (Barnes et al, ; Gillis et al, ; Lease & Ehlers, ), and uplift over a basement ramp (Whipple & Gasparini, ). Our modeling shows that the motion of crustal material over the basement sheet B ramp focuses 5–8 km of exhumation in this region resetting cooling signals in a westward younging pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As any of the aforementioned processes would have promoted additional crustal thickening, if sufficient in scale, they may have generated an appropriately large orogenic edifice to promote further frictional resistance and heightened coupling along the plate boundary (Iaffaldano & Bunge, ; Meade & Conrad, ). In fact, the central Andes may have reached a threshold condition, whereby mountain building became self reinforcing, with (a) the growth of sizeable topography and a thick hinterland backstop (Barnes & Ehlers, ; Oncken et al, ), (b) aridification of forearc regions and further starving of the trench (Lamb & Davis, ; Norton & Schlunegger, ; Strecker et al, ), and/or (c) cyclical buildup and removal of dense orogenic roots (DeCelles et al, , ). Although speculative, it is posited here that a late middle Eocene to earliest Miocene phase of flat slab subduction, which did not affect the southern Andes, provided a trigger for enhanced coupling and protracted contractional growth of the central Andes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(, ); Schlunegger et al . (); Norton and Schlunegger (), a fixed reference concavity ( θ ref = 0.45) was used to calculate a normalized steepness index ( k sn ). Using a reference concavity overcomes the inherent correlation of regression slope and intercept in Equation , and facilitates comparison of gradients in channels with widely varying drainage areas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%