Migrants as second-class workers in urban China? A decomposition analysis

Abstract

a b s t r a c tDémurger, Sylvie, Gurgand, Marc, Li, Shi, and Yue, Ximing-Migrants as second-class workers in urban China? A decomposition analysis In urban China, urban resident annual earnings are 1.3 times larger than long-term rural migrant earnings as observed in a nationally representative sample in 2002. Using microsimulation, we decompose this difference into four sources, with particular attention to path-dependence and statistical distribution of the estimated effects: (1) different allocation to sectors that pay different wages (sectoral effect); (2) hourly wage disparities across the two populations within sectors (wage effect); (3) different working times within sectors (working time effect); and (4) different population structures (population effect). Although sector allocation is extremely contrasted, with very few migrants in the public sector and very few urban residents working as self-employed, this has no clear impact on earnings differentials, because the sectoral effect is not robust to the path followed for the decomposition. The second main finding is that the population effect is robust and significantly more important than wage or working time effects. This implies that the main source of disparity between the two populations is pre-market (education opportunities) rather than on-market. Journal of Comparative Economics 37 (4) (2009) 610-628.

Hukou-Based Stratification in Urban China’s Segmented Economy

“…Meng and Zhang (2001) reported not only significant occupational segregation between urban residents and rural migrants, but also social discrimination reflected by a significant earnings gap within the same occupational group. Consistent with previous descriptive analysis of samples from specific cities and regions (Knight, Song, and Jia 1999;Wang, Zuo, and Ruan 2002), Démurger and his colleagues revealed that rural migrants are much younger, much less experienced, and much less educated than urban residents based on national survey data (Démurger et al 2009). They further argued that the earning disparity between these two groups stems mainly from premarket (education opportunities) rather than on-market factors.…”

Neighborhood-health links: Differences between rural-to-urban migrants and natives in Shanghai

“…As such, rural-to-urban migration is a crucial factor influencing China's industrialization and urbanization; thus, the fundamental solution of the "threedimensional rural issues" (concerning agriculture, countryside, and farmers) and the promotion of social equality and fairness (Démurger et al 2009;Li and Wu 2010) both need to address the challenges of rural-to-urban migration. The poor social integration of migrant workers in host urban areas could pose a risk factor for social instability in general and a challenge for Shanghai in particular.…”

Migrant Workers and Workplace Bullying in Urban China

“…Unlike other papers, I do not compare between urban and native workers, rather I look at the variation among different migrant workers and explore whether migrant workers with greater knowledge of the labor law are able to secure better workplace welfare. Like some of the previous studies, I do control for regional differences (Hare 2002), and industry/sectoral differences (Démurger et al 2009). In light of studies such as Gallagher et al (2015) who have found a substantial correlation between education and knowledge of the labor law, I test for robustness by using ordered logit regressions.…”