2008
DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31818aa930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mifepristone for the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyomas

Abstract: I.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
33
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(22 reference statements)
10
33
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We can find no logical explanation for this result as there should not be any difference in the endometrial response to the action of mifepristone dependent on whether the subject suffers from uterine fibroids or endometriosis. In fact, for example, the increases in endometrial thickness in our previous studies into both conditions [4][5][6][7][8][9]25] and in both subgroups in the present study are similar. Anyway, given that the PAECs are considered to be "physiological" modifications of the endometrium, the only point of importance to be noted in this section is the non-existence of any case of endometrial hyperplasia or of any other pathology either in the post-treatment biopsies or, of course, in the pre-treatment biopsies regardless of whether it was the second, third or fourth treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…We can find no logical explanation for this result as there should not be any difference in the endometrial response to the action of mifepristone dependent on whether the subject suffers from uterine fibroids or endometriosis. In fact, for example, the increases in endometrial thickness in our previous studies into both conditions [4][5][6][7][8][9]25] and in both subgroups in the present study are similar. Anyway, given that the PAECs are considered to be "physiological" modifications of the endometrium, the only point of importance to be noted in this section is the non-existence of any case of endometrial hyperplasia or of any other pathology either in the post-treatment biopsies or, of course, in the pre-treatment biopsies regardless of whether it was the second, third or fourth treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…One potential link between the effects of the two key steroid hormones on ULMs is that estradiol induced the expression of the progesterone receptor and supported progesterone action on leiomyoma tissue [48]. Clinical findings also support these laboratory observations; studies have involved the evaluation of mifepristone (RU 486) [50][51][52], azoprisnil [43,49], and more recently, CDB-2914 and CDB-4124 (CDB: Contraceptive Development Branch) [53].…”
Section: Antiprogesteronesmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Mifepristone is another SPRM that has been extensively researched but is not yet available in Canada for the treatment of UF. Various doses of mifepristone (2.5-50 mg) have been tested in the treatment of UFs, with reported reduction of UF size of up to 57% by 3 months of therapy 63,64 . As with ulipristal acetate, mifepristone therapy is associated with the development of PAEC 64,65 .…”
Section: Medical Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%