Midwifery students’ retention of learning after screen-based simulation training on neonatal resuscitation: a pilot study

Barré, Jessy; Michelet, D.; Truchot, Jennifer; Cabon, Philippe; Tesnière, Antoine

doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000525

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, the results show that participants strongly endorsed growth mindset and weakly endorsed fixed mindset. Further, the findings show that HCPs largely enjoyed playing the game, which was also echoed in other computer-based simulations for neonatal resuscitation [ 46 , 47 ]. Together with the results regarding the use of terminology in the game, the findings suggest that HCPs appreciate the guided apprenticeship and realism of the simulator.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 54%

Health Care Providers’ Performance, Mindset, and Attitudes Toward a Neonatal Resuscitation Computer-Based Simulator: Empirical Study

Cutumisu

Ghoman

et al. 2020

JMIR Serious Games

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Neonatal resuscitation involves a complex sequence of actions to establish an infant’s cardiorespiratory function at birth. Many of these responses, which identify the best action sequence in each situation, are taught as part of the recurrent Neonatal Resuscitation Program training, but they have a low incidence in practice, which leaves health care providers (HCPs) less prepared to respond appropriately and efficiently when they do occur. Computer-based simulators are increasingly used to complement traditional training in medical education, especially in the COVID-19 pandemic era of mass transition to digital education. However, it is not known how learners’ attitudes toward computer-based learning and assessment environments influence their performance. Objective This study explores the relation between HCPs’ attitudes toward a computer-based simulator and their performance in the computer-based simulator, RETAIN (REsuscitation TrAINing), to uncover the predictors of performance in computer-based simulation environments for neonatal resuscitation. Methods Participants were 50 neonatal HCPs (45 females, 4 males, 1 not reported; 16 respiratory therapists, 33 registered nurses and nurse practitioners, and 1 physician) affiliated with a large university hospital. Participants completed a demographic presurvey before playing the game and an attitudinal postsurvey after completing the RETAIN game. Participants’ survey responses were collected to measure attitudes toward the computer-based simulator, among other factors. Knowledge on neonatal resuscitation was assessed in each round of the game through increasingly difficult neonatal resuscitation scenarios. This study investigated the moderating role of mindset on the association between the perceived benefits of understanding the terminology used in the computer-based simulator, RETAIN, and their performance on the neonatal resuscitation tasks covered by RETAIN. Results The results revealed that mindset moderated the relation between participants’ perceived terminology used in RETAIN and their actual performance in the game (F3,44=4.56, R2=0.24, adjusted R2=0.19; P=.007; estimate=–1.19, SE=0.38, t44=–3.12, 95% CI –1.96 to –0.42; P=.003). Specifically, participants who perceived the terminology useful also performed better but only when endorsing more of a growth mindset; they also performed worse when endorsing more of a fixed mindset. Most participants reported that they enjoyed playing the game. The more the HCPs agreed that the terminology in the tutorial and in the game was accessible, the better they performed in the game, but only when they reported endorsing a growth mindset exceeding the average mindset of all the participants (F3,44=6.31, R2=0.30, adjusted R2=0.25; P=.001; estimate=–1.21, SE=0.38, t44=−3.16, 95% CI –1.99 to –0.44; P=.003). Conclusions Mindset moderates the strength of the relationship between HCPs’ perception of the role that the terminology employed in a game simulator has on their performance and their actual performance in a computer-based simulator designed for neonatal resuscitation training. Implications of this research include the design and development of interactive learning environments that can support HCPs in performing better on neonatal resuscitation tasks.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 54%

Health Care Providers’ Performance, Mindset, and Attitudes Toward a Neonatal Resuscitation Computer-Based Simulator: Empirical Study

Cutumisu

Ghoman

et al. 2020

JMIR Serious Games

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ANTS system uses a set of 4-point Likert scales to rate observed behaviours in relation to these elements and categories in addition to providing space for open comments 19 20. Researchers have investigated the positive effects of interventions such as cognitive aids, mental practice and simulation interventions on improving ANTS 21 22…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…19 20 Researchers have investigated the positive effects of interventions such as cognitive aids, mental practice and simulation interventions on improving ANTS. 21 22 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and applications of the Anaesthetists’ Non-Technical Skills behavioural marker system: a systematic review

Kang,

Hu,

Yan

et al. 2024

BMJ Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo comprehensively synthesise evidence regarding the validity and reliability of the Anaesthetists’ Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) behavioural marker system and its application as a tool for the training and assessment of non-technical skills to improve patient safety.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesWe employed a citation search strategy. The Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published from 2002 to May 2022.Eligibility criteriaEnglish-language publications that applied the ANTS system in a meaningful way, including its use to guide data collection, analysis and reporting.Data extraction and synthesisStudy screening, data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. We appraised the quality of included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists. A framework analysis approach was used to summarise and synthesise the included articles.Results54 studies were identified. The ANTS system was applied across a wide variety of study objectives, settings and units of analysis. The methods used in these studies varied and included quantitative (n=42), mixed (n=8) and qualitative (n=4) approaches. Most studies (n=47) used the ANTS system to guide data collection. The most commonly reported reliability statistic was inter-rater reliability (n=35). Validity evidence was reported in 51 (94%) studies. The qualitative application outcomes of the ANTS system provided a reference for the analysis and generation of new theories across disciplines.ConclusionOur results suggest that the ANTS system has been used in a wide range of studies. It is an effective tool for assessing non-technical skills. Investigating the methods by which the ANTS system can be evaluated and implemented for training within clinical environments is anticipated to significantly enhance ongoing enhancements in staff performance and patient safety.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022297773.

show abstract

“…Rigorous testing showed that the ANTS behavioural marker system has a reasonable level of accuracy and reliability 18. Researchers have investigated the effect of interventions to improve ANTS, such as use of cognitive aid, mental practice and simulation interventions 20 21. In this context, measuring non-technical performance is paramount to ensuring the provision of safe, high-quality care.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and applications of the anaesthetists’ non-technical skills behavioural marker system: protocol for a systematic review

Kang

Yan

et al. 2022

BMJ Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe high incidence of unsafe anaesthetic care leads to adverse events and increases the burden on patient safety. An important reason for unsafe anaesthesia care is the lack of non-technical skills (NTS), which are defined as personal cognitive, social or interpersonal skills, among anaesthetists. The anaesthetists’ NTS (ANTS) behavioural marker system has been widely used to evaluate and improve anaesthetists’ behavioural performance to ensure patient safety. This protocol describes a planned systematic review aiming to determine the validity and reliability of the ANTS behavioural marker system and its application as a tool for the training and assessment of ANTS and for improving patient safety.Methods and analysisThis systematic review follows the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol. Studies that applied the ANTS behavioural marker system in a meaningful way, including using the ANTS behavioural marker system to guide data collection, analysis, coding, measurement, and/or reporting, which have been published in peer-reviewed journals, will be eligible. A citation search strategy will be employed. We will search Scopus and Web of Science for publications from 2002 to May 2022, which cite the three original ANTS behavioural marker system publications by Fletcheret al. We will also search the references of the relevant reviews for additional eligible studies. For each study, two authors will independently screen papers to determine eligibility and will extract the data. The quality of the included studies will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklists. A framework analysis approach that consists of five steps—familiarisation, identifying a thematic data extraction framework, indexing, charting, mapping and interpretation—will be used to synthesise and report the data.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this study. The findings will be disseminated primarily through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022297773.

show abstract

Midwifery students’ retention of learning after screen-based simulation training on neonatal resuscitation: a pilot study

Cited by 4 publications

References 19 publications

Health Care Providers’ Performance, Mindset, and Attitudes Toward a Neonatal Resuscitation Computer-Based Simulator: Empirical Study

Health Care Providers’ Performance, Mindset, and Attitudes Toward a Neonatal Resuscitation Computer-Based Simulator: Empirical Study

Development and applications of the Anaesthetists’ Non-Technical Skills behavioural marker system: a systematic review

Development and applications of the anaesthetists’ non-technical skills behavioural marker system: protocol for a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About