Midtveisevaluering av Groruddalssatsingen

Ruud, Marit Ekne; Holm-Hansen, Jørn; Nenseth, Vibeke; Tønnesen, Anders

doi:10.7577/nibr/samarbeidsrapport/2011/3

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Both socio-cultural place analyzes and area-oriented work are thus concerned with lifting people's wants and needs into decision making, and in the latter case to lift the whole area socially and economically. However, these initiatives are criticized for focusing more on beautification of surroundings, construction of new attractions and places people can meet (Oslo municipality 2016, p.16;Ruud et al, 2011). Thus, a key challenge when striving to obtain and let contextual knowledge matter, is to bridge the seemingly deep gap between the physical and the socio-economic-cultural by linking planning and its tools and measures with welfare and broader social measures that directly affect people's living conditions and contribute to social equity.…”

Section: Development Of Comprehensive and Locally Based Knowledgementioning

confidence: 99%

To Enhance Social Equity Through Urban Planning: The Potential for Innovation

Hofstad¹

2020

Innovation in Public Planning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Development Of Comprehensive and Locally Based Knowledgementioning

confidence: 99%

To Enhance Social Equity Through Urban Planning: The Potential for Innovation

Hofstad¹

2020

Innovation in Public Planning

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Groruddalssatsningen hadde som mål at sysselsettingsgraden og ledighetsgraden i området ikke skal skille seg vesentlig fra gjennomsnittet i Oslo. Det ble imidlertid aldri iverksatt noen strategier eller tiltak for å nå målet, og midtveisevalueringen av satsingen (Ruud et al 2011) slo fast at programmet manglet midler og ressurser til satsing på kvalifisering og arbeid i området. De fire bydelene i Groruddalen; Alna, Bjerke, Grorud og Stovner, inngikk på denne bakgrunn en intensjonsavtale med Nav Oslo og Integrerings-og mangfoldsdirektoratet om et felles utviklingsprogram; Program for økt sysselsetting, kvalifisering og bedrede levekår i Groruddalen.…”

Section: Innledningunclassified

Introduksjonsprogrammet i de fire bydelene i Groruddalen

Aasen¹,

Skålnes²

2015

NIBR-notat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

De fire bydelene i Groruddalen; Alna, Bjerke, Grorud og Stovner, inngikk i 2013 en intensjonsavtale med Nav Oslo og Integrerings-og mangfoldsdirektoratet IMDi), om et felles utviklingsprogram: Program for økt sysselsetting, kvalifisering og bedrede levekår i Groruddalen. En av ideene dette utviklingsprogrammet har kommet fram med er å organisere et felles introduksjonsprogram for nyankomne flyktninger, istedenfor som nå hvor programmet er forvaltet av den enkelte bydel. Dette notatet er en forstudie for en slik mulig sammenslåing av introduksjonsprogrammet i de fire bydelene. Notatet er basert på en rask kartlegging av organisering og gjennomføring av programmet i de fire bydelene, og av koordinering, laeringsarenaer, og forbedringspotensial. Det var i all hovedsak positive synspunkter fra alle bydelene på å samle arbeidet i alle bydelene i ett introduksjonsprogram. Man var opptatt av at et felles introduksjons-program for de fire bydelene kunne føre til et større og mindre sårbart fagmiljø med større muligheter til ivaretakelse og videreutvikling av kompetansen på feltet.

show abstract

“…This is important point since area-based strategies are the solution politicians in Oslo turn to as remedies to the challenges identifies in ongoing debates about an ethnically divided city (Bøhler 2011). The area-based initiatives in the Grorud Valley, however, do not seem to have any visible effects on the demographic composition and social conditions (Ruud et al 2011). Academic, media and political discourses M ost of those expressing concerns over marginalized and angry "ghetto" residents in Norway are non-academics, and such debates have been ongoing since at least the 1980s. Before we discuss the public debate of 2009, it is important to situate it within larger scholarly debates.…”

Section: The Grorud Valleymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Myth of Failed Integration: The Case of Eastern Oslo

Andersen

Biseth

2013

City & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article we examine the dominant assumptions that immigrant youth living in the working‐class suburban areas in Oslo, Norway are marginalized and angry. We argue that there is no proof that immigrants living in the Oslo suburbs are alienated from society. Nor do we see any indications of some form of mobilization among this group. This dominant assumption is linked to a larger misperception about “ghettos” in Oslo. The idea, that there are “immigrant ghettos” in Oslo, has similarities with, and draws on public debates about “immigrants” in other European cities and a broader international scholarly discourse. In this paper we show that teenagers and young adults in the most materially deprived areas in Oslo are not socially isolated, but actively participate in crucial mainstream institutions and arenas. We show that these youths have ideals, values, and ambitions that closely duplicate those of most Norwegian teenagers and young adults. We conclude therefore, that the young people labeled as “immigrants” are not only integral members of Norwegian society, but co‐producers of it.

show abstract

Midtveisevaluering av Groruddalssatsingen

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

To Enhance Social Equity Through Urban Planning: The Potential for Innovation

To Enhance Social Equity Through Urban Planning: The Potential for Innovation

Introduksjonsprogrammet i de fire bydelene i Groruddalen

The Myth of Failed Integration: The Case of Eastern Oslo

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About