2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Midterm outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a stand-alone procedure in super-obese patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A single-institution series demonstrated the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery to treat patients with BMI > 50 kg/m 2 [ 31 ]. In some studies, SG and RYGB were comparable at 3-year follow-up [ 32 ], whereas others reported better results for RYGB at 1- and 2-year follow-up compared to SG [ 33 ], and OAGB at 1 year was more effective than SG [ 34 ]. Bhandari et al reported their experience in India in a retrospective study with 3-year follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single-institution series demonstrated the safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery to treat patients with BMI > 50 kg/m 2 [ 31 ]. In some studies, SG and RYGB were comparable at 3-year follow-up [ 32 ], whereas others reported better results for RYGB at 1- and 2-year follow-up compared to SG [ 33 ], and OAGB at 1 year was more effective than SG [ 34 ]. Bhandari et al reported their experience in India in a retrospective study with 3-year follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a limited number of studies with up to 5-year outcomes that have focused on the outcomes of higher risk and/or super obese patients who underwent SG, many with the plan of second stage definitive procedure to follow. These studies were either retrospective (16), without comparison group (16), unmatched (1719) or had lacked long-term follow up (1719). Even so, the reported weight change, weight change comparison and obesity-related comorbidity improvement outcomes are similar, for the most part, to this LABS-2 report.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereaux et al in a single site study identified 74 SG (mean BMI 57.2 kg/m 2 ) and 285 RYGB (mean BMI 56.7 kg/m 2 ) patients and compared weight change and DM improvement at one year; RYGB demonstrated better weight loss and resolution of DM (17). Most recently, Hong et al in a retrospective study identified 106 SG with 501 RYGB patients with a preoperative BMI greater than 50 kg/m 2 with follow up to 3 years (19). There was not a statistically significant difference between procedures in the weight loss or rate of type 2 DM remission at any point in the 3-year follow up period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SG was developed as the rst stage of a 2-stage bariatric surgical procedure especially for the super obese patient group with BMI≥50 (20,21). The consequent studies proved that SG on its own was also an effective bariatric surgical procedure (8,22,23). Some studies performed showed that SG provided more weight loss and caused less development of insulin sensitivity as compared to RYGB (24,25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%