Middleware for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Analysis

Masri, Wassim; Mammeri, Zoubir

doi:10.1109/npc.2007.165

Cited by 28 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To suit some more nodes later on, network scalability is one of principle obstacles to accomplish this goal. Scalability in the sensor organize shows the capacity to deal with developing measures of work in a powerful way and be readily enlarged [6]. e) Redundancy Because of the frequent node failures and unavailability of failed nodes, Absence of worldwide distinguishing proof Due to extensive number of sensor nodes in a sensor organize the worldwide global identification (GID) is for the most part impractical.…”

Section: D) Scalabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Detailed Survey on Challenges, Applications and Attacks in Wireless Sensor Network

2017

IJAERD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: D) Scalabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Detailed Survey on Challenges, Applications and Attacks in Wireless Sensor Network

2017

IJAERD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Until a few years ago, the following categorisation of sensor network middleware was often used (adapted from Andreou et al (2011);Hadim and Mohamed (2006a,b); Henricksen and Robinson (2006); Masri and Mammeri (2007)):…”

Section: Middleware Components In Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

An overview of centralised middleware components for sensor networks

Onderwater

2016

IJAHUC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sensors are increasingly becoming part of our daily lives: motion detection, lighting control, environmental monitoring, and keeping track of energy consumption all rely on sensors. Combining data from this wide variety of sensors will result in new and innovative applications. However, access to these sensors -or the networks formed by them -is often provided via proprietary protocols and data formats, thereby obstructing the development of applications. To overcome such issues, middleware components have been employed to provide a universal interface to the sensor networks, hiding vendor-specific details from application developers. The scientific literature contains many descriptions of middleware components for sensor networks, with ideas from various fields of research. Recently, much attention in literature is aimed at what we, in this paper, define as 'centralised' middleware components. These components consider sensor networks that have no capacity -in terms of memory, data storage, and cpu power -to run middleware components (partially) on the sensor nodes. Often, viewed from the position of the middleware component, these sensor networks function as simple data providers for applications.In this paper we introduce the term 'centralised' for such middleware components, guided by a literature review of existing middleware components for sensor networks. We describe their general architecture, give a description of a representative set of four centralised middleware components, and discuss advantages and disadvantages of these components. 1Finally, we identify directions of further research that will impact centralised middleware systems in the near future.

show abstract

“…With a middleware included, applications implement their functionality in a more abstract manner. In [Hadim, and Mohamed, (2006)], [Masri, and Mammeri, (2007)], [Molla, and Ahamed, (2006)] the classifications of middleware approaches for WSN are described. The classification proposed in [Masri, and Mammeri, (2007)] identifies the following main middleware classes: database approach, event-based approach, application driven approach, modular approach and virtual machine approach.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Semantic web based architecture for managing hardware heterogeneity in wireless sensor network

Nikolić

Penca

Segedinac

et al. 2011

Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are vivid and relatively new paradigm. Usually they are built for the specific purposes which, in the case of large systems of WSNs, can result in high level of hardware heterogeneity. In this paper an ontology-based model aimed at resolving the hardware heterogeneity in large systems of WSNs, and the GLOSENT architecture that facilitates integration of heterogeneous WSNs are proposed. As a proof of concept a concrete SN device SunSPOT is represented using proposed ontology.

show abstract

Middleware for Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Analysis

Cited by 28 publications

References 23 publications

A Detailed Survey on Challenges, Applications and Attacks in Wireless Sensor Network

A Detailed Survey on Challenges, Applications and Attacks in Wireless Sensor Network

An overview of centralised middleware components for sensor networks

Semantic web based architecture for managing hardware heterogeneity in wireless sensor network

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About