2018
DOI: 10.1080/10798587.2017.1290328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middleware for Internet of Things: Survey and Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application examples for commonly used technologies in terms of middleware types are Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) (Akerberg, Gidlund & Björkman, 2011), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) (Bartneck, Klaas, Schoenherr, & Siemens, 2009), Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communication (Fang et al, 2014), and Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems (Strasser,Ebenhofer,Sünder,& Valentini,0000). Middleware should aim to ease the development of new applications and enable integration of heterogeneous computing and communication devices supporting interoperability (Chelloug & El-Zawawy, 2017). Current challenges are driven by functional requirements (for example, code management and event management), nonfunctional requirements (for example, scalability, real-time, reliability, security and privacy or ease of deployment) and architectural requirements (for example, programming abstraction, interoperability, service-based, adaptive and context-awareness).…”
Section: Information and Communication Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application examples for commonly used technologies in terms of middleware types are Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) (Akerberg, Gidlund & Björkman, 2011), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) (Bartneck, Klaas, Schoenherr, & Siemens, 2009), Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communication (Fang et al, 2014), and Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems (Strasser,Ebenhofer,Sünder,& Valentini,0000). Middleware should aim to ease the development of new applications and enable integration of heterogeneous computing and communication devices supporting interoperability (Chelloug & El-Zawawy, 2017). Current challenges are driven by functional requirements (for example, code management and event management), nonfunctional requirements (for example, scalability, real-time, reliability, security and privacy or ease of deployment) and architectural requirements (for example, programming abstraction, interoperability, service-based, adaptive and context-awareness).…”
Section: Information and Communication Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The smart city consists of various smart applications or makes device smart in the city such as smart agriculture, smart parking, smart house, monitoring the climate environment, smart building, smart traffic and transportation systems and etc. [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system of interrelated physical systems and computing devices introduces many opportunities as every object in the system can communicate with related objects of the system by using two-way communications. Specifically talking about energy systems, IoT could offer advanced connectivity of heterogeneous objects to form a single system [2]. However, there are some challenges in seamless integration of different domains once various services have to be offered beyond machine-to-machine (M2M) communications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation gets worse as a number of systems such as power systems, control systems, and communication systems are integrated into a bigger system while each is following its unique set of objectives. Although a great effort can be found in the literature about every issue of energy systems, integration of subsystems is a hot research topic at this time [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation