1996
DOI: 10.1080/00940771.1996.11495901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle School Program and Participatory Planning Drive School Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The "middle school concept" included interdisciplinary teaming, block scheduling, advisory and exploratory courses (Jenkins & Jenkins, 1995;Tadlock & LoGuidice, 1994), and proved attractive to administrators and teachers. There were examples of middle schools undergoing transformation to be more responsive to young adolescents, along with cautionary tales describing potential pitfalls as well as potential benefits (Polite, 1995;Sullivan, 1996;Thomason & Thompson, 1992). Articles reflected a strong sense of "knowing" how to transform schools and knowing their central characteristics-what "is" and what is "not" (Alexander, 1995) effective.…”
Section: -1999: Hope In the Midst Of Stormsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "middle school concept" included interdisciplinary teaming, block scheduling, advisory and exploratory courses (Jenkins & Jenkins, 1995;Tadlock & LoGuidice, 1994), and proved attractive to administrators and teachers. There were examples of middle schools undergoing transformation to be more responsive to young adolescents, along with cautionary tales describing potential pitfalls as well as potential benefits (Polite, 1995;Sullivan, 1996;Thomason & Thompson, 1992). Articles reflected a strong sense of "knowing" how to transform schools and knowing their central characteristics-what "is" and what is "not" (Alexander, 1995) effective.…”
Section: -1999: Hope In the Midst Of Stormsmentioning
confidence: 99%