2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2009.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle Eocene deformation–sedimentation in the Luracatao Valley: Tracking the beginning of the foreland basin of northwestern Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
37
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The study area is situated at ∼25°S, between the arid, internally drained orogenic Puna Plateau in the west and the undeformed Chaco Plain foreland basin in the east. Specifically, this region comprises the southern sectors of the Eastern Cordillera (EC), the Santa Barbara System (SBS), and the Sierras Pampeanas morphotectonic provinces (Figures 1 and 2b); here, we refer to the study area as a whole as the “Salta foreland.” At this latitude the Andean orogen was, until the middle Miocene, bordered by a contiguous foreland basin [e.g., Coutand et al , 2001; Hernández et al , 2005; Carrapa et al , 2008; Bosio et al , 2009]. Since that time, contractile inversion of the Cretaceous Salta Rift [e.g., Baldis et al , 1976; Rolleri , 1976; Bianucci and Homovec , 1982; Salfity , 1982; Allmendinger et al , 1983; Marquillas and Salfity , 1988; Mon and Salfity , 1995; Grier et al , 1991; Viramonte et al , 1999; Kley and Monaldi , 2002; Kley et al , 2005; Carrera et al , 2006; Carrera and Muñoz , 2008] has led to a patchwork of basement‐cored ranges and intervening intermontane basins that have experienced episodes of internal, or reduced external, drainage conditions [e.g., Malamud et al , 1996; Bookhagen et al , 2001; Salfity et al , 2004], but have been recaptured by rivers that are adjusted to the undeformed foreland (Figure 2a).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study area is situated at ∼25°S, between the arid, internally drained orogenic Puna Plateau in the west and the undeformed Chaco Plain foreland basin in the east. Specifically, this region comprises the southern sectors of the Eastern Cordillera (EC), the Santa Barbara System (SBS), and the Sierras Pampeanas morphotectonic provinces (Figures 1 and 2b); here, we refer to the study area as a whole as the “Salta foreland.” At this latitude the Andean orogen was, until the middle Miocene, bordered by a contiguous foreland basin [e.g., Coutand et al , 2001; Hernández et al , 2005; Carrapa et al , 2008; Bosio et al , 2009]. Since that time, contractile inversion of the Cretaceous Salta Rift [e.g., Baldis et al , 1976; Rolleri , 1976; Bianucci and Homovec , 1982; Salfity , 1982; Allmendinger et al , 1983; Marquillas and Salfity , 1988; Mon and Salfity , 1995; Grier et al , 1991; Viramonte et al , 1999; Kley and Monaldi , 2002; Kley et al , 2005; Carrera et al , 2006; Carrera and Muñoz , 2008] has led to a patchwork of basement‐cored ranges and intervening intermontane basins that have experienced episodes of internal, or reduced external, drainage conditions [e.g., Malamud et al , 1996; Bookhagen et al , 2001; Salfity et al , 2004], but have been recaptured by rivers that are adjusted to the undeformed foreland (Figure 2a).…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper section of the Santa Bárbara Subgroup and coeval units farther west exhibit early signs of contractional deformation. For example, growth strata preserved along the present‐day Puna margin provide clear evidence for Eocene to Oligocene tectonism giving rise to foreland‐basin style sedimentation [e.g., Hongn et al , 2007; Bosio et al , 2009]. Proximal and distal units pertaining to this early stage of Andean evolution are well documented [e.g., Vergani and Starck , 1989a, 1989b; Salfity et al , 1993; Starck and Vergani , 1996].…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Santa Barbara subgroup is composed of early foreland basin sandstones, siltstones, limestones, and shales [ Marquillas et al , 2005]. Early foreland basin strata (Paleogene) were deposited on a mixed substratum within a continuous regional basin that was later divided into smaller isolated basins by intrabasin range uplift in the late Miocene [ Jordan and Alonso , 1987; Grier et al , 1991; Starck and Vergani , 1996; Bosio et al , 2009]. These strata are represented in the southern EC by four formations of the Eocene‐Pliocene Payogastilla group [ Grier and Dallmeyer , 1990].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These subbasins accumulated more than 3.5 km of sediment from Neocomian to Maastrichtian time [ Grier et al , 1991], and although Neogene deformation has overprinted the intricate geometry of the original rifts [ Kley and Monaldi , 2002], extensional structures striking perpendicular to Andean stresses have been preferentially reactivated as the major reverse fault bounded ranges of the modern Argentinean EC during the Cenozoic [ Carrera et al , 2006; Mon and Salfity , 1995]. Deformation within the Puna region and along its margins developed since the Paleogene, and significant thick‐skinned deformation has been active along the margins of the Puna province since the middle Eocene [ Bosio et al , 2009; Coutand et al , 2006; Carrapa et al , 2005; Deeken et al , 2006; Hongn et al , 2007; Riller et al , 2001]. Paleogene sedimentation in the southern central Andes occurred in a foreland basin that was regionally extensive, partially segmented by inherited structural highs and geographically complex [e.g., Carrapa et al , 2005; Carrapa and DeCelles , 2008; Hongn et al , 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%