2019
DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle Ear Muscle Reflex and Word Recognition in “Normal-Hearing” Adults: Evidence for Cochlear Synaptopathy?

Abstract: Objectives: Permanent threshold elevation after noise exposure, ototoxic drugs or aging is caused by loss of sensory cells; however, animal studies show that hair cell loss is often preceded by degeneration of synapses between sensory cells and auditory nerve fibers. The silencing of these neurons, especially those with high thresholds and low spontaneous rates, degrades auditory processing and may contribute to difficulties understanding speech in noise. Although cochlear synaptopathy can be diagnosed in anim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
64
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(111 reference statements)
7
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite extensive efforts, evidence consistent with the hypothesized adverse effects of cochlear synaptopathy on auditory perception in living humans remains elusive (Grose et al, 2017;Guest et al, 2017a;Johannesen et al, 2019;but cf. Liberman et al, 2016;Mepani et al, 2020;Prendergast et al, 2019;Prendergast et al, 2017a;Prendergast et al, 2018;Shehorn et al, 2020;e.g., Spankovich et al, 2014). Early studies of cochlear synaptopathy tested mainly young normal-hearing listeners trying to avoid confounding effects of hearing loss that could explain the observed effects or offset them (Garrett et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite extensive efforts, evidence consistent with the hypothesized adverse effects of cochlear synaptopathy on auditory perception in living humans remains elusive (Grose et al, 2017;Guest et al, 2017a;Johannesen et al, 2019;but cf. Liberman et al, 2016;Mepani et al, 2020;Prendergast et al, 2019;Prendergast et al, 2017a;Prendergast et al, 2018;Shehorn et al, 2020;e.g., Spankovich et al, 2014). Early studies of cochlear synaptopathy tested mainly young normal-hearing listeners trying to avoid confounding effects of hearing loss that could explain the observed effects or offset them (Garrett et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A smaller number of studies have included older normal or near-normal hearing individuals when exploring different proxy measures of cochlear synaptopathy (Mepani et al, 2020;Prendergast et al, 2019). The main reason for limiting the study samples to young adults is that older individuals often have higher audiometric thresholds even when the thresholds are within the limits of "normal hearing" as defined by ANSI standards (ANSI, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a hidden hearing loss theory has advocated that synaptic loss is the primary pathology even with only temporary threshold shifts, and that this synaptic loss is independent from both IHC and SGN loss [ 6 , 30 ]. Cochlear synaptopathy may contribute to hearing impairment in millions of people [ 8 , 31 ]. If these damaged synaptic connections can be maintained or restored by any potential drugs or other therapeutic management, it could undoubtedly improve the hearing function [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on auralisations can offer the means to study HA performance in more realistic sound environments (Compton-Conley et al 2004;Minnaar, Favrot, and Buchholz 2010;Mueller et al 2012;Minnaar et al 2013;Grimm, Kollmeier, and Hohmann 2016;Cubick and Dau 2016). Various sound materials for speech recognition tests that include variations in reverberation have also been developed (Noffsinger, Wilson, and Musiek 1994) and are becoming more widely used, for instance, in research on cochlear synaptopathy (Liberman et al 2016;Mepani et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%