2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.709416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle-Aged and Older African Americans' Information Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Interview Study

Abstract: African Americans in the United States have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in infection and mortality rates. This study examined how middle-aged and older African American individuals accessed and evaluated the information about COVID-19. Semi-structured interviews with 20 individuals (age: 41–72) were conducted during the first stay-at-home advisory period in late March and early April 2020. The phronetic iterative approach was used for data analysis. We found that these individuals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main sources of information for our elderly adults were the TV and the newspapers. Similar results were observed in a qualitative study among middle-aged and elderly African Americans [13] as well as in surveys of elderly Finns [14] and Greeks [15] and the residents of Hong Kong [16] and China [17]. These sources of information can be considered formal because the information delivery is professionally edited and adjusted for a mass audience before it is published.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The main sources of information for our elderly adults were the TV and the newspapers. Similar results were observed in a qualitative study among middle-aged and elderly African Americans [13] as well as in surveys of elderly Finns [14] and Greeks [15] and the residents of Hong Kong [16] and China [17]. These sources of information can be considered formal because the information delivery is professionally edited and adjusted for a mass audience before it is published.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%