1980
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(80)80062-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Midbrain regions involved in call production in Java sparrows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the dorsomedial nucleus of ICo) observed in the present study to give rise to projections to XIIts and the respiratory premotor nuclei. Although this is consistent with the finding that in some studies there is a direct relationship between lowest effective current intensity and proximity to the nucleus here identified anatomically as DM (e.g., Potash, 1970b;Brown, 1971;Seller, 1980), it is apparently not consistent with the fact that vocalization can be elicited, even with small electrodes and small currents, from regions of the midbrain at some distance from DM. Scheich et al (1983), for instance, show stimulation sites at the level of caudal MLd in the guinea fowl that were effective in eliciting natural calls at well below 50 µA.…”
Section: Identification and Location Of Dmsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…the dorsomedial nucleus of ICo) observed in the present study to give rise to projections to XIIts and the respiratory premotor nuclei. Although this is consistent with the finding that in some studies there is a direct relationship between lowest effective current intensity and proximity to the nucleus here identified anatomically as DM (e.g., Potash, 1970b;Brown, 1971;Seller, 1980), it is apparently not consistent with the fact that vocalization can be elicited, even with small electrodes and small currents, from regions of the midbrain at some distance from DM. Scheich et al (1983), for instance, show stimulation sites at the level of caudal MLd in the guinea fowl that were effective in eliciting natural calls at well below 50 µA.…”
Section: Identification and Location Of Dmsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…It has long been known that electrical stimulation of certain regions of the avian midbrain, collectively known as the ''midbrain call area,'' can elicit vocalizations (e.g., Popa and Popa, 1933;Lan, 1958;Brown, 1965Brown, , 1971Murphy and Phillips, 1967; Potash, 1970a,b;Delius, 1971;Peek and Phillips, 1971;Seller, 1980;Jahnke and Abs, 1982;Li and Lan, 1990). The most effective sites, i.e., those where vocalization can be elicited with the smallest amounts of current, correspond to a nuclear component of the intercollicular complex (ICo) in close proximity to rostral levels of the inferior colliculus, known as nucleus mesencephalicus lateralis, pars dorsalis (MLd).…”
Section: Indexing Terms: Avian; Vocalization; Respiration; Midbrain; mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Electrical stimulation of the DM results in the production of calls in a number of species, in both passerines and nonpasserines [Brown, 1971[Brown, , 1973Seller, 1981]. Lesions of this area result in apparent muteness [Brown, 1965b;Seller, 1980;Fukushima and Aoki, 2000]. In a detailed study of red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) , electrical stimulation of DM triggered calls of relatively invariant structure [Brown, 1971].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%