Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume 2021
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MIDAS: A Dialog Act Annotation Scheme for Open Domain HumanMachine Spoken Conversations

Abstract: Dialog act prediction in open-domain conversations is an essential language comprehension task for both dialog system building and discourse analysis. Previous dialog act schemes, such as SWBD-DAMSL, are designed mainly for discourse analysis in humanhuman conversations. In this paper, we present a dialog act annotation scheme, MIDAS (Machine Interaction Dialog Act Scheme), targeted at open-domain human-machine conversations. MIDAS is designed to assist machines to improve their ability to understand human par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This tagging scheme, while provides more detailed information compared with previous works, only focuses on the system side in a task-oriented setting and may need major modifications when applied to open-domain dialogues. After the initial flourish, recent works come with their own definitions and tagsets for dialog act, tailored for different scenarios or special needs (Budzianowski et al, 2018;Yu and Yu, 2019).…”
Section: Dialog Act In Dialogue Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tagging scheme, while provides more detailed information compared with previous works, only focuses on the system side in a task-oriented setting and may need major modifications when applied to open-domain dialogues. After the initial flourish, recent works come with their own definitions and tagsets for dialog act, tailored for different scenarios or special needs (Budzianowski et al, 2018;Yu and Yu, 2019).…”
Section: Dialog Act In Dialogue Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the self-disclosure levels were contextdependent, we included the bot's utterance of the last turn, and the previous user utterance segments of the current turn in the input to classify each user utterance segment. Inspired by (Yu and Yu, 2021)'s method of context representation, we appended the bot's last utterance (bot last turn), the user's utterance prior to the target segment of the same turn (user prev segs), and the target user segmented text (user cur seg) as [CLS] bot last turn : user prev segs [SEP] user cur seg [SEP]. If there was no previous user segment, we then put an EMPTY token in the user prev segs.…”
Section: Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, we can enhance the recall of Regexes intent detection by incorporating existing deep learning-based NLU (Natural Language Understanding) models. Specifically, we re-purpose an open-sourced dialog act classification model (Yu and Yu, 2021) to enhance disengagement intent detection: we select 6 out of the 23 supported dialog act labels that are associated with disen-gaged intents, and map each selected dialog act label to the heuristic groups. The dialog act "complaint" is mapped to the heuristic group "complain system repetition";"closing" is mapped to the disengaged intent "request termination"; "hold" to "hesitation";"other_answers" to "unsure answer"; "back-channeling" to "back-channeling", and "neg_answer" to 'negative answer'".…”
Section: Heuristic Functions Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%