1991
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1991)103<0210:mwsapa>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-Wisconsinan stratigraphy and paleoenvironments at the St. Charles site in south-central Iowa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No ice bounded the lobe in Iowa to help resist flow (Figure 2), so the reconstructed driving stress of the lobe should provide a good estimate of its average basal shear stress, at least in areas away from the glacier margin. The low basal shear stress indicates that the lobe was not frozen to its bed, an inference consistent with the relatively warm boreal climate during the lobe's advance (Baker, 1996; Bettis et al, 1996; Schwert & Torpen, 1996). The time‐averaged advance rate of the lobe, estimated from radiocarbon dates (Clayton et al, 1985) corrected for variable atmospheric production of C 14 (Stuiver et al, 1998), was ~1700 m year −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…No ice bounded the lobe in Iowa to help resist flow (Figure 2), so the reconstructed driving stress of the lobe should provide a good estimate of its average basal shear stress, at least in areas away from the glacier margin. The low basal shear stress indicates that the lobe was not frozen to its bed, an inference consistent with the relatively warm boreal climate during the lobe's advance (Baker, 1996; Bettis et al, 1996; Schwert & Torpen, 1996). The time‐averaged advance rate of the lobe, estimated from radiocarbon dates (Clayton et al, 1985) corrected for variable atmospheric production of C 14 (Stuiver et al, 1998), was ~1700 m year −1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…U. dioica ssp. dioica is not officially represented in California; it was, however, introduced to other parts of North America by European settlers in the 1800s and entered into widespread medicinal use by Native Americans after that ( Baker et al, 1991 ; Borchers et al, 2000 ; Preston and Woodland, 2012 ; Santucci and Tweet, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%