2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0738-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-term survivorship of cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using modular mini-keel tibial implants

Abstract: BackgroundReports of diverse outcomes in modular mini-keel tibial componentry for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have raised concerns about early aseptic loosening. Cruciate-retaining (CR) prostheses, using mini-keel implants, have yet to be reported and compared to posterior-stabilizing (PS) designs.MethodsA retrospective, case-matched study of 91 consecutive TKAs (n = 46 CR; n = 45 PS prostheses), using modular mini-keel tibial componentry with a 45-mm drop down stem extension, was conducted. The Knee Society… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yoo et al [38] found that the survival rate was 99.4% with a minimum follow-up of 5 years and there were no prosthesis-related revisions. Yang et al [39] evaluated the efficacy and longevity of a modular tibial implant in MIS TKA and compared the difference between CR and posterior-stabilized (PS) designs. They reported that the survival rate was 97.8% and 95% with CR and PS designs, respectively, at 5 years of follow-up and that MIS TKA with both CR and PS prostheses achieved similarly good clinical results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yoo et al [38] found that the survival rate was 99.4% with a minimum follow-up of 5 years and there were no prosthesis-related revisions. Yang et al [39] evaluated the efficacy and longevity of a modular tibial implant in MIS TKA and compared the difference between CR and posterior-stabilized (PS) designs. They reported that the survival rate was 97.8% and 95% with CR and PS designs, respectively, at 5 years of follow-up and that MIS TKA with both CR and PS prostheses achieved similarly good clinical results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%