2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-Term Results of EVAR in Severe Proximal Aneurysm Neck Angulation

Abstract: Mid-term outcomes following EVAR with the Endurant Stent Graft were not influenced by severe proximal neck angulation in our population. Despite the conformability of the device, moderate aortic neck remodeling was identified in the group of patients with angulated neck anatomy on the first computed tomography scan after implantation with no important further remodeling afterwards. No device integrity failures were encountered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent data suggest that type IA endoleaks may not carry such a dire prognosis as previously believed. Several studies have demonstrated low rates of rupture and aneurysm-related mortality and high rates of spontaneous sealing in select patients, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] but these studies are limited by small numbers and limited follow-up. The goal of this study was to examine our institutional experience with type IA endoleaks in an effort to document long-term outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent data suggest that type IA endoleaks may not carry such a dire prognosis as previously believed. Several studies have demonstrated low rates of rupture and aneurysm-related mortality and high rates of spontaneous sealing in select patients, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] but these studies are limited by small numbers and limited follow-up. The goal of this study was to examine our institutional experience with type IA endoleaks in an effort to document long-term outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, no correlation between the dilatation of proximal and distal landing levels is observed (14). Concerning changes in the neck angle between the preoperative condition and the immediate postoperative condition, data show that there is no clear relationship found between only the angle of the neck and proximal stent-graft migration (46, 47). Especially in large AAAs, we have found that there is a 15% increase in neck angulation and a 27% decrease in neck length after EVAR, compared to small AAAs, with no difference in outcome (48).…”
Section: Progression Of Proximal Aaa Neck After Evarmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Unfavorable neck angulation greater than 60 degrees has been considered to be a contraindication to EVAR, although recent studies using more modern, conformable endografts have demonstrated the efficacy of EVAR treatment in patients with unfavorable neck angulation without significant differences in primary or secondary outcomes of EVAR 4 years out (21,(45)(46)(47). Further long-term results with these modern endograft devices are still ongoing (47).…”
Section: Imaging Tools For Surgical Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further long-term results with these modern endograft devices are still ongoing (47). Proximal neck diameter must also be quantified in order to provide proper stent oversizing.…”
Section: Imaging Tools For Surgical Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%