2016
DOI: 10.1272/jnms.83.184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-Term Clinical Results of VerSys Hip System (Zimmer) Uncemented Total Hip Replacement Arthroplasty

Abstract: Recent reports suggest that uncemented total hip replacement arthroplasty (THR) results in favorable short-to mid-term clinical results. In the present study, we assessed the mid-term clinical results of VerSys Hip System uncemented THR at our hospital. Materials and Methods:We studied patients who received THR using VerSys Hip System and who could be followed-up more than 3 years. Clinical records were used to retrospectively identify patient characteristics, which included age, gender, disease requiring THR,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We confirmed that CT-based navigation contributed to placing the acetabular component with high precision ( Figure 2 ). Previous reports have described the correlation between precise cup implantation and clinical benefits; however, many of the cases were followed up for a short period [ 15 , 16 ]. In our current study, the survival rate was 99.3% when the endpoint was revision surgery over a >18-year follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We confirmed that CT-based navigation contributed to placing the acetabular component with high precision ( Figure 2 ). Previous reports have described the correlation between precise cup implantation and clinical benefits; however, many of the cases were followed up for a short period [ 15 , 16 ]. In our current study, the survival rate was 99.3% when the endpoint was revision surgery over a >18-year follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, dislocation occurs not only due to the implantation angle of the acetabular component but also due to the anteversion of the femoral component, head size, neck shaft angle of the femoral component, the tension of the soft tissue, the preservation of the attachment of the muscle and/or joint capsule, and surgical approach [ 10 , 25 , 26 ]. In our study period, femoral head size was 22, 26, or 28 mm, which is smaller than those in recent years and may have affected the dislocation [ 16 , 27 ]. Moreover, the postoperative patient guidance, including the prohibited hip joint position, may not have been consistent [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%