2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5018619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-infrared two-photon absorption in an extended-wavelength InGaAs photodetector

Abstract: We investigate the nonlinear optical response of a commercial extended-wavelength In 0.81 Ga 0.19 As photodetector. Degenerate two-photon absorption in the mid-infrared range is observed at room temperature using a quantum cascade laser emitting at λ = 4.5 µm as the excitation source. From the measured two-photon photocurrent signal we extract a two-photon absorption coefficient β (2) = 0.6 ± 0.2 cm/MW, in agreement with the theoretical value obtained from the E −3 g scaling law. Considering the wide spectral … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of typical Si and other semiconductor based PDs, the quadratic dependence of PC arises at very high optical power densities due to the process of two photon absorption (TPA). [ 28–32 ] However, a simple analysis can be done to understand the negligible likelihood of TPA in our experiments. The TPA cross‐section is given by α TPA = β(λ) I (λ), where β(λ) is the TPA coefficient at that particular wavelength and I (λ) is the intensity of the light used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of typical Si and other semiconductor based PDs, the quadratic dependence of PC arises at very high optical power densities due to the process of two photon absorption (TPA). [ 28–32 ] However, a simple analysis can be done to understand the negligible likelihood of TPA in our experiments. The TPA cross‐section is given by α TPA = β(λ) I (λ), where β(λ) is the TPA coefficient at that particular wavelength and I (λ) is the intensity of the light used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar cases have been illustrated in CdTe, [5] HgCdTe, [6,7] and InSb. [10][11][12][13] Meanwhile, the high quality of the single crystals (Figures 1 and 2 along with SCXRD detection) is also responsible for the sensitivity to low power light especially as compared to the polycrystalline films with grain boundaries and dense defects. Meanwhile, the low dark current of ≈10 nA at 1.0 V makes the device capable to detect a very weak light comparably.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
their ternary alloys, typically including CdTe, [5] HgCdTe, [6,7] InAs, [8,9] InAsSb, and InGaAs, [10][11][12][13] were proved to be the most promising infrared materials, and most of them have already been utilized in various aspects for photodetections commercially. [14,15] Generally, the light power of the common infrared radiation is relatively low from the traditional infrared materials, which would be less effective in most cases for weak light detection in infrared regions.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity map on Figure 1.c illustrates the capability of the nanostructure to concentrate and colocalise the intensities I p and I s , thus increasing the TPA by a gain G = 120 for the optimal optical configuration (a collimated TE polarised 3.39 µm signal at normal incidence and a collimated TE-polarised pump at 1.06 µm pump with an angle of incidence of 11.83 • ). However, other pump related subbandgap processes have been shown to compete with NDTPA [29,30,31], leading to a higher background current and thus a lower SNR especially for low signal intensity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%