1996
DOI: 10.2307/1382786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwear on Canines and Killing Behavior in Large Carnivores: Saber Function in Smilodon fatalis

Abstract: Canids and hyaenids display a high density of features of microwear on canine teeth that reflect· their similarity in killing strategy. However, hyaenids tend to have a higher percentage of short and wide features (pits) because of the high percentage of bone in their diet. Canines of felids display relatively fewer features than canids and hyaenids, which suggest that felids apprehend prey by delivering deep, strong bites that result in less abrasion of the canines. I suggest that canids rely more heavily on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Paleontologists have now examined dental microwear for human ancestors and other fossil primates (Daegling andGrine 1994, 1986;Grine and Kay 1987;Jacobs 1981;King et al 1999;Leakey et al 2003;Lucas and Teaford 1994;Pérez-Pérez et al 1999;Puech et al 1983;Ryan and Johanson 1989;Strait 1993;Teaford and Walker 1984;Ungar 1996;Ungar and Grine 1991;Ungar and Teaford 1996;Walker 1981). Microwear studies have also been applied to a broad range of other fossil taxa, from Paleozoic conodonts (early vertebrates) (Purnell 1995), to Mesozoic sauropod dinosaurs (Fiorillo 1991), to primitive mammals (Biknevicius 1986, Krause 1982, fossil horses (MacFadden et al 1999), giraffes (Solounias et al 1988), muskrats (Gutierrez et al 1998), pigs (Hunter and Fortelius 1994), sabre tooth cats (Anyonge 1996, Van Valkenburgh et al 1990, and other groups.…”
Section: Reconstructing Diets Of Past Peoples and Extinct Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paleontologists have now examined dental microwear for human ancestors and other fossil primates (Daegling andGrine 1994, 1986;Grine and Kay 1987;Jacobs 1981;King et al 1999;Leakey et al 2003;Lucas and Teaford 1994;Pérez-Pérez et al 1999;Puech et al 1983;Ryan and Johanson 1989;Strait 1993;Teaford and Walker 1984;Ungar 1996;Ungar and Grine 1991;Ungar and Teaford 1996;Walker 1981). Microwear studies have also been applied to a broad range of other fossil taxa, from Paleozoic conodonts (early vertebrates) (Purnell 1995), to Mesozoic sauropod dinosaurs (Fiorillo 1991), to primitive mammals (Biknevicius 1986, Krause 1982, fossil horses (MacFadden et al 1999), giraffes (Solounias et al 1988), muskrats (Gutierrez et al 1998), pigs (Hunter and Fortelius 1994), sabre tooth cats (Anyonge 1996, Van Valkenburgh et al 1990, and other groups.…”
Section: Reconstructing Diets Of Past Peoples and Extinct Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And, S. fatalis from La Brea has lower incidence of pits and more scratches on carnassial teeth than the soft/tough-tissue specialist cheetah, Acinonyx jubatus , which suggests that the saber-toothed cat avoided bone and did not utilize carcasses completely [16]. In contrast, the canines of S. fatalis evince heavy pitting but few scratches compared with extant taxa ranging from cheetahs to spotted hyenas [17]. Conflicting interpretations of the inferred feeding behavior of S. fatalis from La Brea, based on microwear feature data and tooth breakage data, suggest that other methods are necessary to clarify degree of carcass utilization by carnivores at La Brea during the Pleistocene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Smilodon fatalis is an ambush predator that likely did not chase its prey far. It used its powerful forelimbs to knock prey off balance and hold it down while it delivered a killing bite with its sabre canines (Anyonge, ; Antón et al ., ; Meachen‐Samuels & Van Valkenburgh, ). Microwear evidence also suggests that S. fatalis fully utilized a carcass and did consume some bones (DeSantis et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%