2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2004.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwear and residue analyses in perspective: the contribution of ethnoarchaeological evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
63
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Use-wear analysis is one of the most rigorous methods for assessing the function of ancient tools: it provides an independent, and where relevant, a complementary approach to the analysis of residues [55]. Research in material sciences has shown that interacting surfaces in relative motion often develop wear.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use-wear analysis is one of the most rigorous methods for assessing the function of ancient tools: it provides an independent, and where relevant, a complementary approach to the analysis of residues [55]. Research in material sciences has shown that interacting surfaces in relative motion often develop wear.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micropolishes can develop diagnostic features that allow the identification of specific contact materials ( keeley 1980;Vaughan 1985). Along with the detection of wear patterns, residues of the contact material adhering to stone tool surfaces are sometimes found, allowing direct evidence of the origin and nature of the worked material and activities conducted by tool users (e.g., Anderson 1980;Christensen et al 1992;dinnis et al 2009;Fullagar 1998;Hardy and Garufi 1998;kealhofer et al 1999;Pawlik 1995Pawlik , 2004bPawlik , 2004crots 2003;rots and williamson 2004;Torrence and Barton 2006).…”
Section: Detecting Modern Traits With Microwear Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use angle is 70°-90° in ethnographic records in ethiopia, where end scrapers are used only in a pulling motion (Brandt 1997 : 735-736;Brandt and Weedman 1997 : 353;Brandt et al 1996 : 40;Gallagher 1974Gallagher : 177-181, 1977Weedman 2002 : 734). However, tanning in a pushing motion does not always produce a lot of micro-flakings on the dorsal face, because the hide is not so hard as to generate a consistent amount of micro-flaking (rots andWilliamson 2004 : 1290). in addition, it is not easy to distinguish micro-flakings caused by using tools from those caused by making tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%