1999
DOI: 10.1177/002215549904700103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave Staining of Enteric Neurons Using Cuprolinic Blue (Quinolinic Phthalocyanin) Combined with Enzyme Histochemistry and Peroxidase Immunohistochemistry

Abstract: SUMMARYMethods that visualize subsets as well as the entire enteric neuron population are not readily available or have proved to be unreliable. Therefore, we attempted to combine NADPH-d histochemistry, AChE histochemistry, and CGRP immunohistochemistry, techniques that mark subsets of enteric neurons, with a technique that appeared to visualize the entire enteric neuron population, the cuprolinic blue staining method. To guarantee representative staining results, the individual staining methods were modified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This method was proposed for the "specific, selective and complete" visualisation of neurons (Heinicke et al 1987;Karaosmanoglu et al 1996;Van Ginneken et al 1999;Román et al 2001). Although our present data are not directly comparable to those of an earlier study based on silver impregnated material (Brehmer and Stach 1998), both the total number of neurons demonstrated and the proportions of morphologically identified neurons are in the same range.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…This method was proposed for the "specific, selective and complete" visualisation of neurons (Heinicke et al 1987;Karaosmanoglu et al 1996;Van Ginneken et al 1999;Román et al 2001). Although our present data are not directly comparable to those of an earlier study based on silver impregnated material (Brehmer and Stach 1998), both the total number of neurons demonstrated and the proportions of morphologically identified neurons are in the same range.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Glial cells were recognized by their intensely S100β-stained soma (arrows). Bar 50 μm substance (Holst and Powley 1995;Van Ginneken et al 1999) and is considered to be equivalent to anti-HuC/D for enteric neuronal quantification (Phillips et al 2004;Ganns et al 2006;Murphy et al 2007). Based on our counts, HuC/D and CB display a similar efficiency in labeling myenteric neurons (89.5% and 93.5%, respectively), reflecting immunofluorescence in whole-mount preparations (96.3% and 95.3%, respectively; Ganns et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our counts, HuC/D and CB display a similar efficiency in labeling myenteric neurons (89.5% and 93.5%, respectively), reflecting immunofluorescence in whole-mount preparations (96.3% and 95.3%, respectively; Ganns et al 2006). Although CB has been proposed as an effective counterstain of enteric neurons for peroxidase immunocytochemistry (Holst and Powley 1995;Van Ginneken et al 1999), it is difficult to combine with immunohistochemical processing (Murphy et al 2007) because of the occurrence of staining problems such as light neuronal perikaryon staining and high background. In agreement with this, our data indicate that HuC/D immunostaining is more effective than CB in outlining neuronal cell bodies in terms of sharpness, intensity, and image definition, together with a lack of background.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, NF immunostaining yielded dense immunoreactivity in the processes and in the ganglionic neuropil; the neuronal outlines were therefore not clear and counting was more difficult. Double labelling with the two markers (Holst and Powley 1995;Van Ginneken et al 1999) made the localisation of NF positivity more accurate and allowed a morphological classification of the NF-stained neurons. Those shapes with an average area of 350 µm 2 corresponded most closely to the type I and III neurons, but rarely to the type II neurons originally described by Dogiel (1899).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%