1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2852(80)90139-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave spectrum, structure, and dipole moment of the trans-trans isomer of methylpropylether

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the two equivalent methyl groups in dimethyl sulfide undergo internal rotations with a torsional barrier of 736 cm −1 [117], significantly lower than the value of 944 cm −1 found for dimethyl ether [118]. Further examples are trans-ethyl methyl sulfide (693 cm −1 ) [119] vs. trans-ethyl methyl ether (893 cm −1 ) [120], or conformer III of n-propyl sulfide (699 cm −1 ) [121] vs. trans-trans-methyl-n-propyl ether (1154 cm −1 ) [122].…”
Section: Sole Methyl Substitution On the Ringmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For example, the two equivalent methyl groups in dimethyl sulfide undergo internal rotations with a torsional barrier of 736 cm −1 [117], significantly lower than the value of 944 cm −1 found for dimethyl ether [118]. Further examples are trans-ethyl methyl sulfide (693 cm −1 ) [119] vs. trans-ethyl methyl ether (893 cm −1 ) [120], or conformer III of n-propyl sulfide (699 cm −1 ) [121] vs. trans-trans-methyl-n-propyl ether (1154 cm −1 ) [122].…”
Section: Sole Methyl Substitution On the Ringmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The MP2/TZ//DZ method predicts, in agreement with previous theoretical results, that the ga conformer (CCCO 60°, CCOC –178°) is the global minimum followed by the aa conformer. It should be noted that the experimental structure determination of methyl propyl ether rests on the assumption that the aa conformer is the dominant species 115. If the ga conformer is indeed the global energy minimum, reanalysis of structural data for this compound may be needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar observation was found while comparing the barrier heights of the thiomethyl group in trans methyl ethyl sulfide (692 cm 1 ) [21] and trans methyl ethyl ether (893 cm −1 ) [56]. For conformer III of methyl n-propyl sulfide, the value of 699.4(37) cm −1 of the thiomethyl group contributes a further data point to support this trend, as the ether methyl group in trans-trans methyl n-propyl ether also has a higher torsional barrier of 1154 cm 1 [35]. We expect the same observation in methyl n-alkyl sulfides and ethers with longer alkyl chain.…”
Section: Thioethers Vs Ethersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Comparison between torsional barriers of oxygen and sulfur analogues has shown that the barrier height is always larger in the oxygen analogue, for example 2-methylfuran (413 cm 1 ) [31] vs. 2-methylthiophene (194 cm 1 ) [32] and dimethylfuran (439 cm 1 ) [33] vs. dimethylthiophene (248 cm 1 ) [34]. In a previous study on methyl propyl ether, only one conformer with Cs symmetry was observed where the barrier to internal rotation of the methoxy methyl group was determined to be 1154(21) cm 1 [35]. We will also compare the conformations and methyl torsional barriers of methyl propyl sulfide with those of methyl propyl ether.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%