2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave Sintering of Advanced Composites Materials: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e microwave-sintered samples have smaller grain size and more uniform size distribution and thus have better performance. Here, it is noted that similar results have been reported in TiC [14], Li 2 TiO 3 ceramic [27], Li 2 TiO 3 -Li 4 SiO 4 biphasic ceramic pebbles [28], and other metallic and ceramic materials [23,24].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e microwave-sintered samples have smaller grain size and more uniform size distribution and thus have better performance. Here, it is noted that similar results have been reported in TiC [14], Li 2 TiO 3 ceramic [27], Li 2 TiO 3 -Li 4 SiO 4 biphasic ceramic pebbles [28], and other metallic and ceramic materials [23,24].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…erefore, small grain size can be obtained at lower sintering temperatures for samples that have been treated by the microwave presintering process, due to the fact that, in the cementation stage, the removal of organic remains is done from the inside out, whereas, in the conventional sintering method, there is an induction process that produces defects during evaporation. is problem can be overcome by the microwave presintering process because the microwave sintering process allows the internal structure of the samples to absorb microwave energy uniformly, which generates a positive temperature gradient that is more effective for eliminating organic remains [23,24]. Guided by the simulation results, the most uniform electromagnetic field distribution and the most ideal microwave absorption location are found.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%