1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf01203491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave measurements of dielectric constants of Snl2 and Snl4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are found to be comparable with the value 11.30 measured using microwave frequencies of 8.95 GHz on powder sample. 6 The polarized zero frequency dielectric constants obtained parallel to the a, b, and c axes of the crystal are 8.83, 9.79, and 9.01, respectively. These results clearly indicate the anisotropy in the optical properties of SnI 2 .…”
Section: Results From Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values are found to be comparable with the value 11.30 measured using microwave frequencies of 8.95 GHz on powder sample. 6 The polarized zero frequency dielectric constants obtained parallel to the a, b, and c axes of the crystal are 8.83, 9.79, and 9.01, respectively. These results clearly indicate the anisotropy in the optical properties of SnI 2 .…”
Section: Results From Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…5 Desai, Rai, and Vyas measured the bulk dielectric constant of SnI 2 as a function of temperature to understand the electric field distribution. 6 Fujita et al 7,8 have recently studied the polarized absorption and reflection spectra of SnI 2 at a lower temperature and they have found a direct transition at 2.57 eV. The Sn 2ϩ ions occupy two inequivalent sites in the monoclinic lattice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D HOP are known to present a strong exciton binding energy 21 related to abrupt dielectric interfaces 22 and exhibit a quantum confinement of type I 23,24 with a dielectric confinement 22,25 attributed to the contrast between the low dielectric constant of the organic part 26 and the high dielectric constant of the inorganic part. 27 On the other hand, 3D HOP show an exciton screened by polar vibrational modes and disordered configurations of polar organic cations. [28][29][30][31] The acquired control over the shape of the active materials allows one to tune quantum and dielectric confinements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13,14] This excitonic binding energy causes dielectric confinement at the interfaces, which leads toward a contrast of dielectric constant values among the organic and inorganic parts. [15,16] Moreover, this confinement tunes the phonon modes greatly affecting the architecture of the materials interface, [17][18][19] In addition, the surface functionalization of inorganic material influences the architecture and dielectric confinement across the interface. This factor controls directly the excitonic behavior and the charge transfer across the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%