2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave digestion for the quantification of inorganic elements in coal and coal ash using ICP-OES

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As ICP-OES requires the sample to be in the form of a solution, prior acid digestions on the solid samples were performed using a microwave digester (Multiwave 3000, Anton Paar). The conditions adopted for this sample preparation precursor are 0.1 g of a solid sample, 0.2 ml 40 wt% hydrofluoric acid (Fluka), 5 ml 65 wt% nitric acid (Suprapur, Merck), 2 ml 30 wt% analytical-grade hydrogen peroxide (Merck), and a microwave power of 1200 W. The digestion conditions adopted in this study were based on prior parameter optimisation [24]. The bulk samples obtained for quantification analysis were first grinded and mixed thoroughly to ensure that subsequent analysis is representative of the bulk sample.…”
Section: Trace Element Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As ICP-OES requires the sample to be in the form of a solution, prior acid digestions on the solid samples were performed using a microwave digester (Multiwave 3000, Anton Paar). The conditions adopted for this sample preparation precursor are 0.1 g of a solid sample, 0.2 ml 40 wt% hydrofluoric acid (Fluka), 5 ml 65 wt% nitric acid (Suprapur, Merck), 2 ml 30 wt% analytical-grade hydrogen peroxide (Merck), and a microwave power of 1200 W. The digestion conditions adopted in this study were based on prior parameter optimisation [24]. The bulk samples obtained for quantification analysis were first grinded and mixed thoroughly to ensure that subsequent analysis is representative of the bulk sample.…”
Section: Trace Element Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing the three digestion methods (microwave, ultrasonic bath and hot plate), microwave offers rapid effective digestion processes and also possesses an advantage of reducing analyte losses (closed system) due to volatilisation [15][16][17]. Furthermore, studies were reported where the use of explosive and toxic acids (HClO 4 and HF, respectively) in coal and coal fly ash digestions have been avoided [18][19][20]. In addition, Wang et al [10,21] reported elemental recoveries of 77-186% when coal samples were digested using microwave and concentrated acidic solutions (HNO 3 -H 2 O 2 and HNO 3 only) without HF, HCl and HClO 4 addition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Additionally, detection and quantification limits allow the determination of a diversity of metals and nonmetals in a myriad of sample types such as cements, ceramics, silicates, geological materials, metallosilicates, refractory compounds, aluminophosphates, silicoaluminophosphates, clays, phyllosilicates, and coals. 4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The chemical analysis of the inorganic solids mentioned above by ICP OES using conventional acid dissolution methods, in open flasks on hot plate, 15 usually involves costly and time-consuming procedures for sample preparation, 3 requiring a long analysis time and large amounts of reagents. Additionally, such conventional procedures do not assure complete dissolution of some solid inorganic samples, especially geological samples 15,16 (including silicates 8,13,17 and aluminosilicates) 14,16 even when a large amount of concentrated acids is used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%