1990
DOI: 10.1109/36.54359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave dielectric properties of dry rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
83
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
15
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dielectric constant of geological surfaces is dependent on the chemical composition, the porosity, and the water content of the subsurface layer [18]. For unvegetated, dry surfaces with only a few compositional differences, changes in the dielectric properties are comparatively small, and radar signature characteristics are dominated by surface roughness properties [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dielectric constant of geological surfaces is dependent on the chemical composition, the porosity, and the water content of the subsurface layer [18]. For unvegetated, dry surfaces with only a few compositional differences, changes in the dielectric properties are comparatively small, and radar signature characteristics are dominated by surface roughness properties [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value of is already considerably lower than the average for all of the silicate classes mentioned above (see Fig. 13 in [22]), although still within the appreciable scatter of the data. Therefore, instead of applying the frequency dependance associated with the much higher values of the quantity measured for the various silicate classes in [22], we will simply use the low-frequency value of as our estimate at the frequency of interest, 16 GHz.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results With Theorymentioning
confidence: 50%
“…13 in [22]), although still within the appreciable scatter of the data. Therefore, instead of applying the frequency dependance associated with the much higher values of the quantity measured for the various silicate classes in [22], we will simply use the low-frequency value of as our estimate at the frequency of interest, 16 GHz. Since, in general, the study found that decreases with frequency, the use of this low-frequency result will lead to a maximum attenuation calculation and a minimum scattering calculation.…”
Section: Comparison Of Results With Theorymentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations