2016
Microwave bone imaging: a preliminary scanning system for proof‐of‐concept
Abstract: This Letter introduces a feasibility study of a scanning system for applications in biomedical bone imaging operating in the microwave range 0.5–4 GHz. Mechanical uncertainties and data acquisition time are minimised by using a fully automated scanner that controls two antipodal Vivaldi antennas. Accurate antenna positioning and synchronisation with data acquisition enables a rigorous proof-of-concept for the microwave imaging procedure of a multi-layer phantom including skin, fat, muscle and bone tissues. The…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
47
15
2
1
Citation Types
0
40
0
1
Year Published
2017
2026
Publication Types
Select...
38
15
3
3
Relationship
3
56
Authors
Journals
Cited by 59 publications
(41 citation statements)
References 14 publications
0
40
0
1
“…The pictorial view of the measurement set-up is shown in Figure 4 and basically coincides with the measurement scheme adopted in [ 36 ]. A breast phantom was scanned by an antipodal Vivaldi antenna in the frequency range [0.5–5] GHz connected to a VNA.…”
Section: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The pictorial view of the measurement set-up is shown in Figure 4 and basically coincides with the measurement scheme adopted in [ 36 ]. A breast phantom was scanned by an antipodal Vivaldi antenna in the frequency range [0.5–5] GHz connected to a VNA.…”
Section: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 68%
“…MWI scans of phantoms were performed by using the measurement setup adopted in [46] and sketched for convenience in Figure 10. According to a multi-monostatic radar configuration, an antipodal Vivaldi antenna scanned the phantoms in the frequency range 0.5-3 GHz.…”
Section: Microwave Imaging Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Images were obtained by first processing data by means of a clutter rejection algorithm aiming at mitigating the signal distortions coming due to the antenna's internal reflection, the skin interface, and other non-tumor breast tissues. In particular, the algorithm was based on a hybrid artefact removal algorithm consisting of a two-step entropy computation and a subspace projection stage [46][47][48][49]. In more detail, the method allowed the setting of the time-gating window (before the signal is ruled out since assumed to be mainly clutter) and to select the subset of sensors' positions where tumor contribution is stronger.…”
Section: Microwave Imaging Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [18] performed a study for bone imaging, collecting the signals in multi-monostatic fashion and using antennas immersed in a coupling liquid. In [18], imaging was performed using a beamforming procedure named non-coherent migration, after applying an average trace subtraction strategy to remove the artefact.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [18] performed a study for bone imaging, collecting the signals in multi-monostatic fashion and using antennas immersed in a coupling liquid. In [18], imaging was performed using a beamforming procedure named non-coherent migration, after applying an average trace subtraction strategy to remove the artefact. Instead, here, we collect the signals in multi-bistatic fashion, using antennas in free space; imaging was performed using an HP based algorithm, which operated in the frequency domain, after applying a rotation subtraction strategy to remove the artefact.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
