2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4073(01)00035-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave backscattering by nonspherical ice particles at using second-order perturbation series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is questionable if the T‐matrix method would work well for larger particles: our results indicate that the surface structure is very important for scattering properties of large particles, and the T‐matrix method cannot handle rough surface. Other methods applicable for small particles include the second‐order perturbation series approximation for Gaussian random spheres [ Muinonen , 2000b; Nousiainen et al , 2001], and so‐called volume‐integral methods which can handle complex geometries. For example, a finite difference time domain method (FDTD) can be used up to x = 20 with ensemble averaging (P. Yang, personal communication, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is questionable if the T‐matrix method would work well for larger particles: our results indicate that the surface structure is very important for scattering properties of large particles, and the T‐matrix method cannot handle rough surface. Other methods applicable for small particles include the second‐order perturbation series approximation for Gaussian random spheres [ Muinonen , 2000b; Nousiainen et al , 2001], and so‐called volume‐integral methods which can handle complex geometries. For example, a finite difference time domain method (FDTD) can be used up to x = 20 with ensemble averaging (P. Yang, personal communication, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, [81] did not consider Gaussian spheres with different angular correlation, which might impact depolarization considerably. For example, [82] found that, for backscattering and small size parameters, highest depolarizations were obtained with correlation lengths that produced elliptical deformation, that is, non-sphericity in its largest scale.…”
Section: Overall Nonsphericitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S 22 /S 11 is sometimes regarded as the indicative element of nonsphericity but it must be noted that the effect is not systematic: here, Sil I shows the strongest depolarization at small size parameters of all the particles, while for larger x it becomes the weakest. Incidentally, Nousiainen et al (2001) noted for microwave backscattering by small graupel particles that the largest-scale deviations from nonsphericity, related to elongation of the particle, were most efficient in depolarizing the backscattered radiation. Our findings here are consistent with this, also suggesting that when the size parameter increases, smaller-scale features in particles become relatively much more important for depolarization, which is quite reasonable.…”
Section: H Lindqvist Et Al: Scattering By Realistic Inhomogeneous mentioning
confidence: 99%