2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave and open vessel digestion methods for biochar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complete acid digestions were performed on 0.1 g of each adsorbent using 50.0 mL of 1:1 95% H 2 SO 4 /70% HNO 3 . 35 Iron dissolved from the oxidizing adsorbent samples goes into the acid over 24 h (70 °C) with stirring. These solutions were then diluted 10-fold with deionized water prior to AAS analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Complete acid digestions were performed on 0.1 g of each adsorbent using 50.0 mL of 1:1 95% H 2 SO 4 /70% HNO 3 . 35 Iron dissolved from the oxidizing adsorbent samples goes into the acid over 24 h (70 °C) with stirring. These solutions were then diluted 10-fold with deionized water prior to AAS analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight percentages of iron in all adsorbents were determined using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) (Shimadzu AA-7000). Complete acid digestions were performed on 0.1 g of each adsorbent using 50.0 mL of 1:1 95% H 2 SO 4 /70% HNO 3 . Iron dissolved from the oxidizing adsorbent samples goes into the acid over 24 h (70 °C) with stirring.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This wet digestion method offers several advantages, including the capacity to use larger reagent volumes and reduced overall cost (Mohammed et al 2017). Despite the prevalent use of microwave digestion procedures in numerous studies involving biological samples (Zhong et al 2016;Wathudura et al 2020), which involves higher costs, literature has consistently reported on comparative studies aimed at achieving higher recovery percentages and reduced matrix effects through the application of open-vessel digestion compared to microwave-assisted digestion (Tüzen 2003;Mohammed et al 2017). The choice of acid combination is important in this aspect.…”
Section: Digestion Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%